2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-018-9418-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open set evaluation of web genre identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional high scores were achieved with fourgrams as non-binary features and bag-of-words. Similarly, Pritsos and Stamatatos (2018) recently achieved an F1-score of 79% based on word trigrams and two of the same corpora that Sharoff et al (2010) used. For other, earlier WGI studies, see Stamatatos et al (2000) based on common words, Kanaris and Stamatatos (2007) based on character n-grams, and Santini (2007) based on structural web page information.…”
Section: Detecting Online Registersmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Additional high scores were achieved with fourgrams as non-binary features and bag-of-words. Similarly, Pritsos and Stamatatos (2018) recently achieved an F1-score of 79% based on word trigrams and two of the same corpora that Sharoff et al (2010) used. For other, earlier WGI studies, see Stamatatos et al (2000) based on common words, Kanaris and Stamatatos (2007) based on character n-grams, and Santini (2007) based on structural web page information.…”
Section: Detecting Online Registersmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2.2). Similarly, Pritsos and Stamatatos (2018) reported that their bestperforming feature sets varied by the used corpora, which suggests that their models may have learnt patterns associated with topics rather than registers.…”
Section: Detecting Online Registersmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations