2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86337-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Set Authorship Attribution Toward Demystifying Victorian Periodicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This, however, is not the case for open-set attribution, as limited research has been conducted thereon. Badirli, Ton, Gungor, and Dundar (2019) discussed the limitations of using standard machine learning approaches for such attribution tasks. Their experiments suggest that linear classifiers can achieve near-perfect attribution accuracy under closed-set assumptions; however, a more robust approach is required once a large list of potential authors is considered.…”
Section: Authorship Attributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, however, is not the case for open-set attribution, as limited research has been conducted thereon. Badirli, Ton, Gungor, and Dundar (2019) discussed the limitations of using standard machine learning approaches for such attribution tasks. Their experiments suggest that linear classifiers can achieve near-perfect attribution accuracy under closed-set assumptions; however, a more robust approach is required once a large list of potential authors is considered.…”
Section: Authorship Attributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, limited research has been conducted on open‐set attribution. Badirli et al (2019) discussed the limitations of using standard machine learning techniques for open‐set authorship attribution problems. Their experiments suggest that linear classifiers can achieve near‐perfect attribution accuracy under closed‐set assumptions; however, a more robust approach is required once a large candidate pool is considered as in open‐set classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%