Open Science Promotes Diverse, Just, and Sustainable Research and Educational Outcomes

Grahe, Jon; Cuccolo, Kelly; Leighton, Dana C.; Alvarez, Leslie D. Cramblet

doi:10.1177/1475725719869164

Cited by 40 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The issue of under-resourced institutions deserves special attention (Grahe et al, 2020). Most research in the U.S. comes out of large public land-grant universities or research-intensive private institutions.…”

Section: Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science

Syed¹,

Kathawalla²

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current moment in psychology is one of great challenges and great opportunities. The open science movement--the move towards more transparent, credible, and reproducible science--has led to a redefinition of what constitutes “normal science.” However, the field of cultural psychology, broadly construed, has by and large not engaged with the open science movement, and likewise, the open science movement has by and large not engaged with cultural psychology. The purpose of the present chapter is to bring open science and cultural psychology closer together, highlighting how they can benefit one another. In doing so, we focus our discussion on three types of representations regarding diversity in psychological research and how they intersect with open science: representation of researchers, or the diversity of the scientists actually doing the research, representation of samples, or who is included as participants in our research studies, and representation of perspectives, or the substantive conceptual and theoretical views we bring to our work. For each of these three types of representation we outline the problem, and then discuss how embracing the principles and behaviors of open science can help.

show abstract

Section: Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science

Syed¹,

Kathawalla²

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although evaluating the contributions of various open science initiatives toward advancing DJS for students, we recently constructed a brief set of questions to guide our evaluations (Grahe et al, 2019). These questions are presented online (https://osf.io/qv8nt/) and provide a framework by which to examine research efforts of individuals or groups.…”

Section: Applying a Djs Lens To This Special Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

“…During my Psi Chi Presidency (2016-17), I organized a symposium at the American Psychological Association about how "Open Science Initiatives Promote Diverse, Just, and Sustainable Research." A subsequent APS symposia with the same title but different speakers inspired a student to expand on the topic for part of her PhD qualifying exams (Cuccolo, 2019), a manuscript under review (Grahe, Cuccolo, Leighton, & Alvarez, 2019), and other conversations that indirectly led to this special issue.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In offering this framework, I presuppose that the reader hopes for a better society and endorses the notion that a society that values diversity, applies justices equitably, and maintains personal and envi ronmental sustainability is inherently better than one that does not. Grahe et al (2019) discussed reasons that the field of psychology already dem onstrates the importance of diversity, social justice, and sustainability, and how existing open science initiatives promote them. However, advancing social progress is rarely simple, and resolving any problem or system while simultaneously advancing DJS is inherently complex.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Scholar Identity Development: A Book Writing Journey and Tips for Undergraduate Mentors

Cabrera¹,

Gilmour²,

Lovell³

2019

PsiChiJournal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Through her leadership and commitment to diversity, she has made the Journal and Psi Chi an even better organization. Following her lead, Psi Chi Journal has implemented a diversity statement and is committed to supporting this statement and standards. Dr. Domenech Rodríguez has left a long lasting impact on Psi Chi-one that we can all be proud of. ABOUT PSI CHI Psi Chi is the International Honor So ci ety in Psychology, found ed in 1929. Its mission: "recognizing and promoting excellence in the science and application of psy chol ogy." (Note. Our new mission statement is available at http://www.psichi.org/?page=purpose) Mem ber ship is open to undergraduates, graduate students, faculty, and alumni mak ing the study of psy chol ogy one of their major interests and who meet Psi Chi's min i mum qual i fi ca tions. Psi Chi is a member of the As so cia tion of Col lege Honor So ci et ies (ACHS), and is an affiliate of the Ameri can Psy cho logi cal As so cia tion (APA) and the Association for Psy cho log i cal Science (APS). Psi Chi's sister honor society is Psi Beta, the na tion al honor society in psychology for com mu nity and junior colleges. Psi Chi functions as a federation of chap ters located at over 1,150 senior col leg es and universities around the world. The Psi Chi Central Office is lo cat ed in Chatta nooga, Ten nessee. A Board of Directors, com posed of psy chol o gy faculty who are Psi Chi members and who are elect ed by the chapters, guides the affairs of the Or ga ni za tion and sets pol i cy with the ap prov al of the chap ters. Psi Chi membership provides two major opportunities. The first of these is ac a dem ic rec og ni tion to all in duc tees by the mere fact of mem ber ship. The sec ond is the opportunity of each of the Society's local chapters to nourish and stim u late the pro fes sion al growth of all members through fellowship and activities de signed to augment and en hance the reg u lar cur ric u lum. In addition, the Or ga ni za tion provides programs to help achieve these goals including con ven tions, research awards and grants competitions, and publication opportunities. JOURNAL PURPOSE STATEMENT The twofold purpose of the Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research is to foster and reward the scholarly efforts of Psi Chi members, whether students or faculty, as well as to provide them with a valuable learning experience. The articles pub lished in the Journal represent the work of under graduates, graduate students, and faculty; the Journal is dedicated to increas ing its scope and relevance by accepting and involving diverse people of varied racial, ethnic, gender identity, sexual orientation, religious, and social class backgrounds, among many others. To further support authors and enhance Journal visibility, articles are now available in the PsycINFO ® , EBSCO ® , Crossref ® , and Google Scholar databases. In 2016, the Journal also became open access (i.e., free online to all readers and authors) to broad en the dissemination of research across the psychological science community.

show abstract

“…For OpenScholarship, there has been relatively little explicit work into the underlying principles (with the exception of the dozens of declarations and charters aimed at OA), and especially regarding those that are universally accepted. A recent review of Open Science demonstrated that it can help to advance diversity, justice and sustainability in the psychological sciences(Grahe et al 2019). Beyond this, OCSDNet is almost unique in this space, in that it proposes seven principles for Open and Collaborative Science as part of its Open Science Manifesto .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship

Agrawal¹,

Baždarić²,

Brassard³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no clear-cut boundary between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship, and the histories, practices, and fundamental principles between the two remain complex. In this study, we critically appraise the intersections and differences between the two movements. Based on our thematic comparison here, we conclude several key things. First, there is substantial scope for new communities of practice to form within scholarly communities that place sharing and collaboration/open participation at their focus. Second, Both the principles and practices of FOSS can be more deeply ingrained within scholarship, asserting a balance between pragmatism and social ideology. Third, at the present, Open Scholarship risks being subverted and compromised by commercial players. Fourth, the shift and acceleration towards a system of Open Scholarship will be greatly enhanced by a concurrent shift in recognising a broader range of practices and outputs beyond traditional peer review and research articles. In order to achieve this, we propose the formulation of a new type of institutional mandate. We believe that there is substantial need for research funders to invest in sustainable open scholarly infrastructure, and the communities that support them, to avoid the capture and enclosure of key research services that would prevent optimal researcher behaviours. Such a shift could ultimately lead to a healthier scientific culture, and a system where competition is replaced by collaboration, resources (including time and people) are shared and acknowledged more efficiently, and the research becomes inherently more rigorous, verified, and reproducible.

show abstract

Open Science Promotes Diverse, Just, and Sustainable Research and Educational Outcomes

Cited by 40 publications

References 63 publications

Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science

Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science

Scholar Identity Development: A Book Writing Journey and Tips for Undergraduate Mentors

A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About