2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open repair of massive rotator cuff tears in patients aged sixty-five years or over: Is it worthwhile?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
40
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The time required for functional recovery reportedly is related to several factors including age [19], rotator cuff tear size [22,30], preoperative muscle weakness [28], and joint mobility [8]. In the literature, the information varies widely regarding the prognostic factors of rotator cuff repair [2,3,11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time required for functional recovery reportedly is related to several factors including age [19], rotator cuff tear size [22,30], preoperative muscle weakness [28], and joint mobility [8]. In the literature, the information varies widely regarding the prognostic factors of rotator cuff repair [2,3,11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies included all tear sizes according to the Cofield classification. 19,36,38,40,42 Lam et al 40 intra-operatively encountered > 5 cm full thickness RCT in all patients (postoperative CSS = 63%). Some studies excluded massive tears (> 5 cm).…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They hypothesized that patients aged 65 years and above could have tendon healing, and consequently, significant functional improvement. In the study by Lam et al, 40 the purpose was to evaluate functional outcome and identify possible preoperative prognostic factors in patients aged 65 years or more, undergoing repair for a massive (> 5 cm) full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Miyazaki et al 35 33,34 were multicenter prospective studies conducted in 11 surgical centers and presented in the Société Française d'Arthroscopie (French Arthroscopic Society, SFA) symposium in 2012.…”
Section: Study Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies evaluate cellular contribution to healing of tendon as significant. In terms of technology application, amount and concentration of the MSCs is still no clear consensus [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 99%