1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0118(199705)25:1<3::aid-jgt1>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open problems of Paul Erd�s in graph theory

Abstract: By (1), the limit, if it exists, is between √ 2 and 4. The proof for the lower bound in (1) is by the probabilistic method.(3) A problem on explicit constructions ($100) Give a constructive proof forfor some constant c > 0. The best known constructive lower bound n c log n/ log log n is due to Frankl and Wilson [144].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(184 reference statements)
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact of λ 1 > 0 follows from the connectivity of G. The eigenvalue λ 1 is intimately related to the rate of convergence of random walks. The reader is referred to [4] for numerous properties concerning eigenvalues of the normalized Laplacian. Although the combinatorial Laplacian is useful for various flow problems in the study of electrical networks, the spectrum of combinatorial Laplacian is not effective (except for almost regular graphs) for applications requiring isoperimetric properties.…”
Section: Laplacian the Green's Function And Pagerankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact of λ 1 > 0 follows from the connectivity of G. The eigenvalue λ 1 is intimately related to the rate of convergence of random walks. The reader is referred to [4] for numerous properties concerning eigenvalues of the normalized Laplacian. Although the combinatorial Laplacian is useful for various flow problems in the study of electrical networks, the spectrum of combinatorial Laplacian is not effective (except for almost regular graphs) for applications requiring isoperimetric properties.…”
Section: Laplacian the Green's Function And Pagerankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral Coordinates The decomposition of the Laplacian matrix L = X T ΛX reveals the graph spectrum [7] which comprises the eigenvalues Λ = diag(λ 0 , λ 1 , ..., λ |V | ) (in increasing order) and their associated eigenmodes X = X (0) , X (1) , ..., X (|V |) (a |V | × |V | matrix where columns X (·) are eigenmodes). The first eigenmode is trivial (λ 0 = 0) and the following non-trivial eigenmodes are the fundamental modes of vibrations of a shape depicted by I Ω .…”
Section: Spectral Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as in most registration methods, transformation updates based on the image gradients are inherently limited by their local scope. Secondly, we introduce a new update scheme for groupwise registration based on the spectral decomposition of graph Laplacians [7,23,13], that is invariant to shape isometry and is capable of capturing large deformations during the construction of the atlas. We provide two forms of our groupwise registration framework that we name the Groupwise Log-Demons (GL-Demons, faster and suited for local nonrigid deformations), and the Groupwise Spectral Log-Demons (GSL-Demons, slower but capable of capturing very large deformations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter, graph spectral representations [10], which are invariant to isometry (preserving geodesic distances), can capture large and complex deformations. Spectral methods [10,11,12,13,14] are popular for general graph partitioning and are applied in computer vision for mesh matching [15,16,17,18] and shape retrieval [19]. Pioneered in the late 80s, [12,13,14], spectral correspondence methods match points in shapes by comparing eigenvectors of a proximity matrix derived from the mesh structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%