2009
DOI: 10.1179/174328609x446619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open pit optimisation – modelling time and opportunity costs

Abstract: Strategic mine planning is the process of determining the configuration that will optimise project objectives. Current methods for ensuring that objectives are optimised, for a given project configuration, contain a number of limitations. In particular, the strategic mine planning process for a given configuration is often completed by the sequential optimisation of key decisions. This approach does not allow for relationships between decisions to be measured accurately. As such, suboptimal mine plans are ofte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, some researchers try to find solutions in the construction of mathematical model forms (mainly constraints) or solving algorithms (usually by feat of approximate algorithms) to boost the solving speed [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] . Increasing the decision-making unit to reduce the quantity of variables and constraints is a more common way, such as combining the modules in the deposit model into a "unit tree" as the decision unit in optimization or taking steps or panels as the decision unit 37,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] . However, due to the low scheduling accuracy (or resolution) in enormous decision units, the results are significantly different from the optimal plans, which also reduces the practicality of the results 47,49,52,53 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some researchers try to find solutions in the construction of mathematical model forms (mainly constraints) or solving algorithms (usually by feat of approximate algorithms) to boost the solving speed [36][37][38][39][40][41][42] . Increasing the decision-making unit to reduce the quantity of variables and constraints is a more common way, such as combining the modules in the deposit model into a "unit tree" as the decision unit in optimization or taking steps or panels as the decision unit 37,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] . However, due to the low scheduling accuracy (or resolution) in enormous decision units, the results are significantly different from the optimal plans, which also reduces the practicality of the results 47,49,52,53 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%