Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1989.100166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open-loop stiffness control of overconstrained mechanisms/robotic linkage systems

Abstract: This work suggests a new (novel) approach for the control of taskspace stiffness characteristics in systems consisting of a superabundance of kinematically dependent inputs. When there are more input actuations than operational degrees off", intemal preloads can be generated that produce effective restoring farces in the face of displacement or disturbances imposed on the system. Examples of this excessive actuation can be found in cutain modes of structurally ovenxnstrained parallel manipulators and in antago… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second part of the control vector c is the null-space component generating prestress that is closest to the desired c 0 . The possibility of generating control forces in the null-space has been used for backlash avoidance and stiffness control Müller (2005;2006); Valasek et al (2002); Yi et al (1989).…”
Section: Inverse Dynamics Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part of the control vector c is the null-space component generating prestress that is closest to the desired c 0 . The possibility of generating control forces in the null-space has been used for backlash avoidance and stiffness control Müller (2005;2006); Valasek et al (2002); Yi et al (1989).…”
Section: Inverse Dynamics Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to exploit this effect, the control forces in the null-space of A T must be such that the change of A T due to a EE-perturbation yields a desired EE-wrench. This was attempted in (Müller, www.intechopen.com 2006; Yi et al, 1989). It turned out that, for the considered PKM, a large number of redundant actuators is required for stable control of all stiffness components.…”
Section: Stiffness Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with the ordinary parallel robot, the parallel robot with redundant actuation can optimize the load distribution between the actuators, reduce the energy consumption of each independent actuator, avoid driving force mutation, and improve force transmission properties of homogeneity and the rigidity of the agency (active stiffness). Thus the parallel robot with redundant actuation can obtain a better dynamic performance, higher stiffness and greater carrying capacity [5], [6]. In recent years, the redundant actuation parallel robot has widely been studied by many researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%