Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2010.5530878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open loop pitch control of a flapping wing micro-air vehicle using a tail and control mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chosen method is a hybrid of Euler and Lagrange techniques and is akin to Kane's equations and the Gibbs-Appel Equations [35]. The flight dynamics model is previously presented in [36,37]. The model, presented here, is enhanced from previous work, including the inclusion of stroke plane dynamics, calculation of the aerodynamic forces and moments based on a quasi-steady/blade-element method, and a more accurate accounting of the angular velocity of the wings.…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chosen method is a hybrid of Euler and Lagrange techniques and is akin to Kane's equations and the Gibbs-Appel Equations [35]. The flight dynamics model is previously presented in [36,37]. The model, presented here, is enhanced from previous work, including the inclusion of stroke plane dynamics, calculation of the aerodynamic forces and moments based on a quasi-steady/blade-element method, and a more accurate accounting of the angular velocity of the wings.…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the B frame, the stroke plane frames are two body-fixed frames originated at the wing joints. The stroke plane frames are denoted by R sp and L sp and have initial [10] Linear No CFD Honeybees Doman et al [13,14] Nonlinear No Quasi steady/blade element Robot Fly Deng et al [18] Nonlinear No Quasi steady/blade element Small wing mass Bolender [26] Nonlinear Yes (two degrees of freedom per wing) Berman and Wang [12] No limitations Sun et al [27] Nonlinear Derived (not simulated) Navier-Stokes No limitations Buler et al [23] Nonlinear Yes (two degrees of freedom per wing) Not specified Ornithopters Grauer and Hubbard [25] Nonlinear Yes (one degree of freedom per wing) Quasi steady Ornithopters Orlowski et al [36,37] Nonlinear Yes (three degrees of freedom per wing) Berman and Wang [12] No limitations orientation parallel to the B frame. The orientation is rotated by an angle about theb y axis of the B frame to the stroke plane.…”
Section: B Reference Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 and compared to a 'wingless' model in Ref. 3, a two wing FWMAV with a tail and control mass in Ref. 26, and a four wing FWMAV in Ref. 27.…”
Section: Multibody Flight Dynamics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of derivation was previously used to develop the equations of motion for a two-wing flapping wing micro-air vehicle 9 and a flapping wing micro-air vehicle with a tail and a control mass. 10 Simulations will investigate four main kinematic configurations, two for the dragonfly configuration and two for the x-wing configuration. The dragonfly configuration will be investigated with biomimetic wing kinematics.…”
Section: Dynamic Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%