2012
DOI: 10.2307/41703458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Knowledge Creation: Bringing Transparency and Inclusiveness to the Peer Review Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various permutations of open review have also been attempted unsuccessfully in the IS discipline (Hardaway & Scamell, 2012). For example, MISQ Discovery, the MISQ repository of living documents, received few submissions.…”
Section: Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various permutations of open review have also been attempted unsuccessfully in the IS discipline (Hardaway & Scamell, 2012). For example, MISQ Discovery, the MISQ repository of living documents, received few submissions.…”
Section: Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…postal services which, coincidentally, had significant uptake in Europe in the seventeenth century, or the invention of the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg in the fifteenth century). Many aspects of the open science model, such as peer review, open access and data sharing, may now be further opened up using digital information technologies (Hardaway and Scamell, 2012;Suber, 2013;van der Aalst et al, 2016). When the first computer systems were distributed in the 1950s, it was common to share software source code.…”
Section: Topics Of Research On Opennessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, peer review (PR), including the double‐blind, single blind, open, and signed variants, is regarded by many as the quintessential mechanism to safeguard academic publishing standards (Benda & Engels, ; Bornmann, ). Although PR is often debated and innovative ways of evaluation of publications are conceivable and put into practice (e.g., Giménez‐Toledo & Román‐Román, ; Hardaway & Scamell, ), virtually all high‐esteem journals use some type of PR to assure content quality of published articles (Hames, ; Research Information Network, ). Hence, the inclusion of journals in citation indexes and academic bibliographic databases depends, among other things, on PR being a part of their editorial procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%