2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30436-1_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Issues and Proposals in the IT Security Management of Commercial Ports: The S-PORT National Case

Abstract: Commercial ports are large scale infrastructures which their Information and Telecommunication (PIT) systems offer critical services and host sensitive data. However the current maritime legislation or standardization efforts do not sufficiently cover the IT security of the commercial ports. Identifying these needs we propose a collaborative environment offering security management services including a targeted risk management methodology which will help commercial ports to self manage their security.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk management international standards range from general considerations and guidelines for risk management processes (e.g., ISO, 2009aISO, , 2009b, to specific guidelines for the IT sector (e.g., ISO, 2013ISO, , 2011Peltier, 2001), and to CI dependency analysis risk assessment methodologies (e.g., Aung and Watanabe, 2009;De Porcellinis et al, 2009;Haimes et al, 2007;Hokstad et al, 2013;ISO, 2009a;Ntouskas and Polemi, 2012;Theoharidou et al, 2011;Zio and Sansavini, 2011), all the way to sector specific frameworks as, for example, in the maritime sector (e.g., Ntouskas and Polemi, 2012;Polemi and Ntouskas, 2012). Most of these standards specify framework conditions for the risk management process, but do not provide specific methodologies targeted to SC risk assessment.…”
Section: Research Efforts Towards Scra Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Risk management international standards range from general considerations and guidelines for risk management processes (e.g., ISO, 2009aISO, , 2009b, to specific guidelines for the IT sector (e.g., ISO, 2013ISO, , 2011Peltier, 2001), and to CI dependency analysis risk assessment methodologies (e.g., Aung and Watanabe, 2009;De Porcellinis et al, 2009;Haimes et al, 2007;Hokstad et al, 2013;ISO, 2009a;Ntouskas and Polemi, 2012;Theoharidou et al, 2011;Zio and Sansavini, 2011), all the way to sector specific frameworks as, for example, in the maritime sector (e.g., Ntouskas and Polemi, 2012;Polemi and Ntouskas, 2012). Most of these standards specify framework conditions for the risk management process, but do not provide specific methodologies targeted to SC risk assessment.…”
Section: Research Efforts Towards Scra Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, choosing the right method and tool for risk assessment proves to be complicated. Since SCs are originating from a business context, SC risk management methods are usually quantitative and are based on monetary costs or potential impact (e.g., Giannopoulus et al, 2012;ISO, 2007;Polemi and Ntouskas, 2012). In practice, the selection of a specific risk-assessment tool is based on practical considerations, and depends on how a specific risk assessment methodology can be mapped to the extended risk assessment needs of SC.…”
Section: Research Efforts Towards Scra Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various maritime standardization bodies (e.g. IMO, EMSA, EASA, TEN-T EA) do not refer in their memorandum to IT/Cyber security [9]. ICT systems security is only assessed in relation to port and ship safety.…”
Section: Port Risk Assesment Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, namespace performs isolation and system virtualization for performing the process. It works as an identifier that links the isolated instances and other global resources [21]. Namespace segments the hostname, user, process, file system, and other related components.…”
Section: Reviews On Protection Mechansimsmentioning
confidence: 99%