2011
DOI: 10.4314/ijest.v2i6.63715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open innovation and supply chain management in food machinery supply chain: a case study

Abstract: Supply chains continue to growth in complexity, including numerous echelons and numerous players per echelon. Consequently, a company needs to integrate its activities with suppliers and customers, in order to survive. Innovation is a typical example of activity that a company should share with suppliers and customers. In particular, over the last few years, a specific concept of "open innovation" has been paving the way in the innovation management field. This paradigm describes a new approach to internal R&D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus a critical task for firms engaged in a category association is to learn a lesson from previously projects and use them for new relationships. In this perspective, category associations have a positive impact on SMEs efficiency in managing partnership that lead to innovations (Bonney, Clark, Collins, & Fearne, 2007;Bigliardi, Bottani, & Galati, 2010;Caiazza, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus a critical task for firms engaged in a category association is to learn a lesson from previously projects and use them for new relationships. In this perspective, category associations have a positive impact on SMEs efficiency in managing partnership that lead to innovations (Bonney, Clark, Collins, & Fearne, 2007;Bigliardi, Bottani, & Galati, 2010;Caiazza, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This sector exhibits a distrust with respect to the openness of innovation to various sources of knowledge, and looks instead to links close to its network and value chain such as customers (Herstatt & Von Hippel, 1992;Boutellier et al, 2008, Hienerth, 2006 or suppliers (Bigliardi et al, 2010) as "trusted" sources for cooperation in terms of process, product, and environmental innovation. Thus, Hypothesis 3a, regarding the favorable effect of geographical source diversity on ecoinnovation, does not hold true.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is about "taking advantage of exceptions; experimenting, failing and succeeding; uncertainty and volatility; inefficiencies; adapting to unforeseen opportunities; and foremost creativity" (Davila et al, 2009, p.285). Whilst innovation has typically been seen to occur within the boundaries of an organization, the manner in which many organizations innovate has changed as it has moved from a closed to an open process (Bigliardi et al, 2010;Chesbrough, 2003). Through inter-firm innovations, organizations actively cooperate with external actors to compensate for their scarce internal resources and limited competencies (Lichtenthaler, 2008;Baum et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%