Open innovation and network dynamics. An analysis of openness of co-patenting collaborations in Florence, Italy

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relational dynamics for innovation and, in particular, the impact of the openness of innovation process on the innovation capacity of organisations in restricted geographical contexts. Design/methodology/approach Through a negative binomial regression, the work analyses how the characteristics of the openness of the organisation’s innovation process in the period 2004-2010 influence the firm’s patent productivity in the following period (2011-2016). Findings The breadth of the open innovation (OI) process, here measured by the number of external network ties that an organisation realises for the realisation of its patents, has a positive effect on patent productivity. The depth of the openness, that is, the intensity of external network ties, has an equally positive influence on the innovative performance. However, after a tipping point, the patent productivity tends to decrease, underlining the costs and problems of OI practices. Research limitations/implications This study considers only patent collaborations in the city of Florence. Therefore, it focusses on codified innovations and on a single territorial case study. Practical implications The results underline the importance of the adoption of OI practices in restricted geographical contexts (such as cities, clusters or industrial districts) but with several limitations. Only collaborating more with others does not foster the organisation’s invention productivity, but different types of evidence are found here. Originality/value An original database has been created, containing all the information on patents realised in the area of Florence from 2004 until 2016, and a social networks analysis was applied to identify the local innovation networks.

Territorial servitisation in Italian industrial districts: the role of technological and professional KIBS

“…The challenge posed by globalisation hit the ID model of production on many levels. Responses have mostly focused on creating and defending highly profitable market niches through product distinctiveness and customisation, innovation and design, product experiencing and trend setting, branding and marketing (Bellandi and De Propris, 2015; Belussi and De Propris, 2013; Capone and Innocenti, 2020). Therefore, to remain competitive, IDs had to carve their own space in volatile global markets, as well as seize global production opportunities (Bellandi and De Propris, 2015).…”

Hackathons for Driving Service Innovation Strategies: The Evolution of a Digital Platform-Based Ecosystem

“…They aim to develop new products, increase business value, and look at business opportunities by sharing knowledge, competencies, and technological resources [7,19]. Open innovation, which acts as a driving force for effective internal and external flows of knowledge and technology, is unable to capture the value of these flows unless it is first harnessed by essential internal resources [1,19,20].…”

“…They aim to develop new products, increase business value, and look at business opportunities by sharing knowledge, competencies, and technological resources [7,19]. As a driving force for effective external and internal flows of knowledge and technology, open innovation dynamics cannot capture the value of these flows unless it is harnessed by key internal resources [1,19,20]. Open business models enable an organization to be more effective in creating and capturing value.…”

Clusters and Innovation: The Relationship Between Membership in Clusters Organisations and Technological Maturity of Companies in Poland

“…They argue that location in a cluster may be a handicap as some companies face a risk of losing their competitive advantage resulting from their own knowledge. The negative aspects of networking in open innovation are noticed for example by Capone and Innocenti (2020). The authors claim that a "generic" openness is not a positive determinant for the invention capacity of the organisations.…”