Open innovation and intellectual property rights

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between open innovation and the use of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The authors consider patents, industrial designs (i.e. design patents in the USA), trademarks, and copyrights. Design/methodology/approach The relationships between open innovation, IPRs, and profitability are tested with random-effects panel regressions on data from the Spanish Community Innovation Survey for 2,873 firms spanning the years 2008-2013. Findings A key result is that SMEs do not benefit from open innovation or from patenting in the same way as larger firms. Furthermore, the results show that SMEs profit in different ways from IPR, depending on their size and the corresponding IPR. Research limitations/implications The different impact of IPRs on the efficiency of open innovation in firms of varying sizes highlights the importance of further investigation into IP strategies and into open innovation in SMEs. Practical implications Industrial designs are currently the most efficient IPR for SMEs to protect their intellectual property in open innovation collaborations. Depending on the company size, the use of different IPRs is recommended. Moreover, firms should seek to increase the efficiency of open innovation and the use of IPRs. Social implications The high impact of SMEs on employment highlights the importance of fomenting efficient innovation processes in such firms. Originality/value This paper opens the black box of IPR in relation to open innovation in SMEs, and draws distinctive conclusions with regards to patents, industrial designs, trademarks, and copyrights.

Board Governance, Sustainable Innovation Capability and Corporate Expansion: Empirical Data from Private Listed Companies in China

“…Firms may have planned to develop a new product or process to improve their productivity, reduce costs and reduce environmental pollution with a high degree of sustainable innovation ability [54]. On the measurement of sustainable innovation capability, according to Hall [55], intangible assets [56], including patents [57], non-patented technologies [58], trademarks [59] and copyrights were the elements of enterprise innovation sustainability activities, so we used the growth rate of intangible assets for mediating variable measurement.…”

Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry—Challenges, Insights and Perspectives

“…This may open up previously untapped resources and avenues for innovation, but may also spawn new conflicts. Consider, for example, the question of Intellectual Property Rights in inclusive, participatory innovation settings [30,31]. Regarding the latter, RRI connects core business concerns to overarching societal challenges and is therefore considered a promising way for firms to navigate these issues for the well-being of individuals, communities, countries, regions, and global society [32].…”

Opening Science and Innovation: Opportunities for Emerging Economies

“…New ideas and innovation are transformed into intellectual property by companies. Thus, they apply models of management of this property [Brem et al, 2017]. In this sense, it is convenient to analyze the application of open licenses, both for scientific and business products, to reduce costs and ensure sustainability.…”