Open Heritage Data

Roued-Cunliffe, Henriette

doi:10.29085/9781783303618

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The meteoric rise of social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube in the 2010s made them a relevant domain of inquiry for broader research communities and fields, whose diverse epistemic orientation and theoretical arsenal becomes consequential for researchers interested in HMI practices on SNS. Research on HMI-related practices on SNS draw from diverse theorizations of material and intangible heritage in the context of heritage studies (Harrison, 2013(Harrison, , 2020Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, 1995;MacDonald, 2009;Meskell, 2015;Roued-Cunliffe & Copeland, 2017;Smith, 2006;Waterton & Watson, 2015), but also from the historical field of memory studies and its recent shift toward mediated practices (Hoskins, 2018;Olick & Robbins, 1998;Roediger & Wertsch, 2008), as well from communication and media theory (Hall, 1993;Livingstone, 2005) and the focus on participation, social networking and the logic of platforms within digital media studies (Boyd, 2007;Jenkins et al, 2015;Van Dijck et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents the construction and validation of a formal conceptual model, or domain ontology, useful for the formal representation and analysis of conversations on heritage, memory and identity (HMI) on social network sites (SNS), of interviews with participants in such conversations, and of scholarly works engaging with such phenomena. The ontology provides for the first time a conceptual framework for HM interactions on SNS addressing the semiotic and discursive nature of such interactions in the context of cultural-historical activity theory and semiosphere theory. Part of the Connective Digital Memory in the Borderlands research project, it is developed using an evidence-based knowledge elicitation and domain modeling approach. The study presents the three components of the ontology: an event-centric core conceptual model, an inductively derived concept taxonomy, and a meta-theoretical conceptual scheme, based on a combination of conceptual analysis and lexical analysis of relevant scholarly literature. To validate the ontology, it then provides an example of how it can be used to represent an actual HMI-related SNS conversation and scholarly intervention using knowledge graphs, a quantitative analysis of the occurrence of taxonomy terms in different subfields of HMI on SNS studies, a qualitative analysis of concepts used in studies on non-professional, archeological, and institutional heritage communication on SNS, and a meta-theoretical account of studies of HMI on SNS. The ontology can be used as a framework for theorization and for the development of data models, questionnaire protocols, thematic analysis vocabularies, and analysis queries relevant to HMI on SNS research.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 13. Henriette Roued-Cunliffe, Open Heritage Data: An Introduction to Research, Publishing and Programming With Open Data in the Heritage Sector (London: Facet Publishing, 2020), chaps. 4–7. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Cultural Heritage Inequality: Philippine Museums During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Perez

Escueta

Jequinto

2022

Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Like many museums worldwide, Philippine museums moved their operations online when COVID-19 hit. However, studies showed that central to this move was digital heritage collection, which required time and resources spent years before the pandemic began. This paper re-examines the concept of openness of digital cultural heritage in Philippine museums. This paper tries to determine the state of openness of Philippine museums along with their perception of Open Heritage Data. Using the Open Heritage Data Model of Roued-Cunliffe, document analysis of eighty five museum websites was done. This was followed by semi-structured interviews of thirteen Philippine museums. A thematic analysis was done to answer the questions on openness and Open Heritage Data in Philippine museums. Philippine museums have minimal openness when it comes to physical, online, and data access levels. This can be explained by their cataloging practices, the effects of the pandemic on their institution, and their perception of Open Heritage Data. This lack of openness contributes to global inequality in digital cultural heritage.

show abstract

Open Heritage Data

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites

An Ontology of Semiotic Activity and Epistemic Figuration of Heritage, Memory and Identity Practices on Social Network Sites

Digital Cultural Heritage Inequality: Philippine Museums During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About