2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.123817
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open embeddings and pseudoflat epimorphisms

Abstract: We characterize open embeddings of Stein spaces and of C ∞ -manifolds in terms of certain flatness-type conditions on the respective homomorphisms of function algebras.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy has previous been observed in non-commutative geometry by Meyer ([15]) and Connes ([10]), who compute the Hochschild homologies of group convolution algebras and the algebra of smooth functions on the noncommutative 2-torus, using a computable dense subalgebra that is 'isocohomologically' embedded. Similar observations have arisen in the work of Taylor ([20]) and Pirkovskii ( [1]). The main observation of Section 7 is that if A → B is a homotopy epimorphism of simplicial commutative algebras in Ind(Ban R ), then HH(B) ∼ = B ⊗ L A HH(A).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This strategy has previous been observed in non-commutative geometry by Meyer ([15]) and Connes ([10]), who compute the Hochschild homologies of group convolution algebras and the algebra of smooth functions on the noncommutative 2-torus, using a computable dense subalgebra that is 'isocohomologically' embedded. Similar observations have arisen in the work of Taylor ([20]) and Pirkovskii ( [1]). The main observation of Section 7 is that if A → B is a homotopy epimorphism of simplicial commutative algebras in Ind(Ban R ), then HH(B) ∼ = B ⊗ L A HH(A).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…In analytic geometry, one can no longer reasonably use flat epimorphisms as covers for a Grothendieck topology. Indeed, if one works in the category of Fréchet spaces -which is a large enough category containing algebras of complex analytic functions -then for an open subset U of a Stein space (X, O X ), O X (U ) is usually not topologically flat as a Fréchet O X (X)-module (see [1]). Furthermore, the category of Fréchet spaces is not closed due to a plethora of topologies one can impose on the mapping space between two Fréchet spaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C ∞ -manifolds over R) is an open immersion if and only if it induces a weak homological epimorphism between the associated Fréchet C-algebras by [AP20] Theorem 4.2 (resp. [AP20] Theorem 5.3) is another evidence that a homotopy Zariski open immersion is a reasonable counterpart of an open immersion for the smooth setting.…”
Section: We Show the Relation Between The Multiplications Amentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since then, they were rediscovered several times under different names (see [2,6,8,15,17]), both in the purely algebraic and in the functional analytic contexts. A more detailed historical survey is given in [1,Remark 3.16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%