2019 IEEE 24th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/camad.2019.8858492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open CLORO: An Open Testbed for Cloud Robotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 summarizes the main article publication years for testbed facilities, as visible, there are no major trends in the evaluated 10 year period, except for the peak around 2015 and 2016 and following dip at 2017 and 2018, but after that, for two consecutive years, the publication of articles about new testbed facilities continues at a steady pace. Dandelion [24] 2019 NA Yes Indoor and outdoor DUTs, sub-GHz LoRa DUTs Open CLORO [25] 2019 NA No DUTs include moving robot, Android app for robot movement control FIST [26] 2012 NA No Wirelessly managed DUTs, the same radio channel for control and experimentation, tree topology City of Things [27] 2016 NA Yes Urban deployment, integrated big data analysis, includes wearables, data visualization AssIUT IoT [28] Update [29] 2018 4 No DUTs supporting LoRa, WiFi, ZigBee and Cellular communication, web interface TWECIS [30] Abstract [31] 2014 4 No GPIO event timestamping, support of gdb, network-wide power monitoring Rover [32] 2016 8 No Open source, cheap to implement Ocean-TUNE UCONN testbed [33] 2014 [41] 2011 27 Yes Mobile and static DUTs, a large variety of sensors, time synchronization, indoor positioning, robot movement control CaBIUs [42] 2020 30 No Custom designed programming language, web interface SDNWisebed [43] 2019 40 No SDN networking support, traffic statistics for DUTs I3ASensorBed [44] 2013 46 No Wide range of sensors, including CO2, presence, smoke, etc. OpenTestBed [45] 2019 80 Yes Fully open-source FlockLab [46] Demo [47] 2013 106 Yes GPIO tracing and actuation, power monitoring, time synchronization EDI TestBed [23] Updates [48][49][50][51] 2015 110 Yes GPIO interaction, power monitoring, ADC and DAC interaction, versatile deployment options, CLI RT Lab [52] 2015 115 Yes Indoor and outdoor DUTs, online code editing, parameterized control, digital multimeter for power monitoring Indriya [53] 2012 127 Yes Small maintenance costs, distributed in three floors NetEye [54] 2012 130 Yes Topology control, health monitoring, policy-based scheduling USN testbed…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 summarizes the main article publication years for testbed facilities, as visible, there are no major trends in the evaluated 10 year period, except for the peak around 2015 and 2016 and following dip at 2017 and 2018, but after that, for two consecutive years, the publication of articles about new testbed facilities continues at a steady pace. Dandelion [24] 2019 NA Yes Indoor and outdoor DUTs, sub-GHz LoRa DUTs Open CLORO [25] 2019 NA No DUTs include moving robot, Android app for robot movement control FIST [26] 2012 NA No Wirelessly managed DUTs, the same radio channel for control and experimentation, tree topology City of Things [27] 2016 NA Yes Urban deployment, integrated big data analysis, includes wearables, data visualization AssIUT IoT [28] Update [29] 2018 4 No DUTs supporting LoRa, WiFi, ZigBee and Cellular communication, web interface TWECIS [30] Abstract [31] 2014 4 No GPIO event timestamping, support of gdb, network-wide power monitoring Rover [32] 2016 8 No Open source, cheap to implement Ocean-TUNE UCONN testbed [33] 2014 [41] 2011 27 Yes Mobile and static DUTs, a large variety of sensors, time synchronization, indoor positioning, robot movement control CaBIUs [42] 2020 30 No Custom designed programming language, web interface SDNWisebed [43] 2019 40 No SDN networking support, traffic statistics for DUTs I3ASensorBed [44] 2013 46 No Wide range of sensors, including CO2, presence, smoke, etc. OpenTestBed [45] 2019 80 Yes Fully open-source FlockLab [46] Demo [47] 2013 106 Yes GPIO tracing and actuation, power monitoring, time synchronization EDI TestBed [23] Updates [48][49][50][51] 2015 110 Yes GPIO interaction, power monitoring, ADC and DAC interaction, versatile deployment options, CLI RT Lab [52] 2015 115 Yes Indoor and outdoor DUTs, online code editing, parameterized control, digital multimeter for power monitoring Indriya [53] 2012 127 Yes Small maintenance costs, distributed in three floors NetEye [54] 2012 130 Yes Topology control, health monitoring, policy-based scheduling USN testbed…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This platform contains a robotic agent, multiple sensors, and a cloud platform using MYSQL to store all the climate data and robotic communication network [42]. Portaluri et al propose an open testbed for Cloud robotics (Open Cloro) [43] and Do Nascimento et al present the evolution of a software platform for experimentation of mobile robotics [44].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial IntelligenceNayyar et al[45], Aissam et al[13] Machine Learning Nayyar et al[45], Dharmasena et al[42], Wan et al[34], Duran and Pobil[36], Aissam et al[13] Neural Network Nayyar et al[45], Duran and Pobil[36] Open Source Kehoe et al[23], Portaluri et al[43], Tang et al[15], Wan et al[30], Okumus[41], Yan et al[20], Aissam et al[13], Toquica et al[22] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing work on testing platforms for robotic applications focus on Cloud robotics testbeds or platforms [1,3,4,[9][10][11]. In [11], the authors indicate the feasibility and challenges of a real world Cloud robotics implementation over Cloud testbed infrastructure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], the authors indicate the feasibility and challenges of a real world Cloud robotics implementation over Cloud testbed infrastructure. Besides, [4] suggests a Cloud robotics testbed that can be effective for developing not only robot-related experiments, but also network applications. By providing a Cloud robotics testbed for mobile robots, VC-bots [1] tries to address some important factors such as mobility, traffic scenario, protocol, cloud resources and localization awareness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%