2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open-and-closed process innovation generation and adoption: Analyzing the effects of sources of knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, positive adoption of innovation by employees contributes to a more cohesive organisational culture, thus influencing employee integration and increasing the level of trust between them [4]. Recent research also confirms that positive adoption of innovation by employees helps organisations overcome performance shortfalls and seize new opportunities within and around the company [5]. The above aspects are very important from the point of view of sustainable development and considerations on the needs and relationships between society 5.0 and industry 4.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, positive adoption of innovation by employees contributes to a more cohesive organisational culture, thus influencing employee integration and increasing the level of trust between them [4]. Recent research also confirms that positive adoption of innovation by employees helps organisations overcome performance shortfalls and seize new opportunities within and around the company [5]. The above aspects are very important from the point of view of sustainable development and considerations on the needs and relationships between society 5.0 and industry 4.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…First, we focus on the importance of internal and external knowledge sources. We expect that internal sources are crucial in stimulating firm's innovation capabilities and absorptive capacity, help to better understand innovation process within a firm and enhance innovative outputs and competitive advantage, specifically within CEE countries, which often lack of funds and insufficient incentives to cooperate [50][51][52]. Therefore, we hypothesize that: H 1 : Innovators in the catching-up CEE countries depend more on internal knowledge than on external knowledge.…”
Section: Research Aim and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, Demola fits into the aforementioned responsible innovation approach that “proposes a set of procedures by which innovation processes become more responsive to societal challenges” [ 38 ] and for which stakeholder involvement and participation is regarded as a key factor. In addition, as several studies have proved [ 28 , 29 ], that interaction and cooperation are critical factors for effective knowledge creation and transfer, and Demola, as a OIP, integrates the knowledge triangle approach that “emphasizes the linkages between education, research, and innovation” [ 37 ]. Thus, Demola becomes a co-creation process that goes beyond the push and pull approaches to innovation, due to what Fox called VSP latent realities, that “drive down barriers to resources, including specialist knowledge, and greatly reduces transaction costs, in such a way as to open up an ever increasing variety of latent instantiation pathways, association networks, and influence patterns” [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a “traditional” systemic perspective [ 27 ], collaboration between public and private agents in an innovation system is essential both for the generation and transfer of knowledge [ 28 , 29 ], and for the governance of the system itself [ 5 ]. Within this next-generation STI policy framework, public-private interaction becomes the backbone of each policy.…”
Section: A New Scenario For University-industry Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%