2014
DOI: 10.1179/2327427113y.0000000010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open-Air “Adena” Paired-Post Ritual Features in the Middle Ohio Valley: A New Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trader (2005) and Clay and Charles (1992) suggest the beginning of mound construction and elaborate burial practices mark the beginning of the Middle Woodland period (∼2600–1600 cal BP or 400 BCE - 400 CE) in the Kanawha River Basin ∼150 km southwest of Hyre Mound. Specific mortuary practices there include accretional burial mounds with associated tombs, cremations, and circular paired-post structures (Clay and Charles, 1992; Purtill et al., 2014). Armstrong pottery is the diagnostic pottery type in those same Middle Woodland period sites (Trader, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trader (2005) and Clay and Charles (1992) suggest the beginning of mound construction and elaborate burial practices mark the beginning of the Middle Woodland period (∼2600–1600 cal BP or 400 BCE - 400 CE) in the Kanawha River Basin ∼150 km southwest of Hyre Mound. Specific mortuary practices there include accretional burial mounds with associated tombs, cremations, and circular paired-post structures (Clay and Charles, 1992; Purtill et al., 2014). Armstrong pottery is the diagnostic pottery type in those same Middle Woodland period sites (Trader, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar decommissioning of wood post structures by post removal was reported earlier for Poverty Point by Haag (1990), although the nature of the structures he encountered was not clear because of the limited nature of his test excavations. Despite the perimeter testing of only four post circles and their interiors being known only from magnetic signatures, I interpret them as hypaethral or unroofed spaces or “stages” for ritual performance because of their size and apparent lack of interior features that might be expected in a roofed structure (Pacheco et al 2021:84–65; Riordan 2015, 2021); this interpretation is also influenced by current thinking on later timber circles (e.g., Clay 2009; Henry and Barrier 2016:100; Purtill et al 2014; Zink 2009).
Figure 2.Large timber post circles identified by magnetometry at Poverty Point.
…”
Section: Timber Circles At Poverty Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Ohio Valley Middle Woodland where a similar bimodal distribution of timber circles occurs (no cultural historical connection is implied), the smaller of the circles were first interpreted as houses and the larger as open enclosures (Webb and Snow 1945:52–53). Currently both large and small timber circles are now considered open spaces associated with unspecified ritual events (Clay 2009; Purtill et al 2014:75–79). The same may probably be said for Poverty Point, where limited excavation has not identified interpretable features inside the smaller circles that would suggest that they were enclosed.…”
Section: Timber Circles At Poverty Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is unlikely that people lived here on a regular basis (Table 2). Instead, the structures were probably Adena paired-post ritual structures-screen-like enclosures arguably used for non-mortuary, or ancillary mortuary, activities (Clay 1987(Clay , 1998(Clay , 2014Purtill et al 2014). Evidence for episodic gatherings and collective ritual suggests that social consensus was built through the assembling of members of kin-based coalitions for rituals at a communal locale.…”
Section: The Organisation Of Dissonance At Wright Mound Kentuckymentioning
confidence: 99%