2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open access echocardiography has diagnostic yield similar to outpatient echocardiography and is highly rated by general practitioners and patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Valve disease is reported in 12-42% of cases in unrestricted open access services and LV systolic dysfunction in 9-30%. 13,14,16 These incidences are far higher than expected with population screening 1,3 and similar to those in hospitalbased outpatient clinics 15,17 suggesting that GPs are not overusing the service.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Valve disease is reported in 12-42% of cases in unrestricted open access services and LV systolic dysfunction in 9-30%. 13,14,16 These incidences are far higher than expected with population screening 1,3 and similar to those in hospitalbased outpatient clinics 15,17 suggesting that GPs are not overusing the service.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Some describe services set up solely for heart failure. [10][11][12] Those few with relatively unrestricted indications [13][14][15][16] confirm that murmur and possible heart failure are the two most common reasons for referral while, not surprisingly, valve disease and LV systolic dysfunction are the two most common abnormalities detected. Valve disease is reported in 12-42% of cases in unrestricted open access services and LV systolic dysfunction in 9-30%.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is tempting to make decisions about selection of a screening test based on cost minimization, which is only reasonable if the tests are comparable and the clinical outcomes are the same. This is rarely the case ---for example when testing a simple binary assessment between normal and abnormal risk state one might assume that both ECG and echocardiography are superficially similar, but in reality they are markedly different with respect to the sensitivity (rule-out testing) and specificity (rule-in testing) of Pathophysiologic risk [7,20,21]. Absolute cost comparisons are unreliable because the test characteristics and demands are so extremely variable [19].…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness(cost Versus Price)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is defined as services ordered by a designated health care provider without pre-test assessment by experts [21,46]. The athletic population represents the essence of normal, which does not justify the expense of pretest experts [21].…”
Section: Open Access Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation