OPC UA security for protecting substation and control center data communication in the distribution domain of the smart grid

Jafary, Peyman; Repo, Sami; Salmenperä, Mikko; Koivisto, Hannu

doi:10.1109/indin.2015.7281811

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although popular within industrial processes, OPC-UA was not widely adopted within the power-system community [35]. Microgrids, on the other hand, have made OPC-UA a popular choice for communication of their automation controls [35,41].…”

Section: Common Communication Protocols For Cpss and Cptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Design Elements within Power Infrastructure Cyber–Physical Test Beds as Threat Analysis Environments

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyber–physical systems (CPSs) are an integral part of modern society; thus, enhancing these systems’ reliability and resilience is paramount. Cyber–physical testbeds (CPTs) are a safe way to test and explore the interplay between the cyber and physical domains and to cost-effectively enhance the reliability and resilience of CPSs. Here a review of CPT elements, broken down into physical components (simulators, emulators, and physical hardware), soft components (communication protocols, network timing protocols), and user interfaces (visualization-dashboard design considerations) is presented. Various methods used to validate CPS performance are reviewed and evaluated for potential applications in CPT performance validation. Last, initial simulated results for a CPT design, based on the IEEE 33 bus system, are presented, along with a brief discussion on how model-based testing and fault–injection-based testing (using scaling and ramp-type attacks) may be used to help validate CPT performance.

show abstract

Section: Common Communication Protocols For Cpss and Cptsmentioning

confidence: 99%