2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.899591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OPC modeling and correction solutions for EUV lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models are currently used in many EUV lithography simulators. [9][10][11] An implicit assumption of the pattern decomposition method in the models is that the mask pattern is large and isolated. However, optical proximity correction (OPC) masks are decorated by small patterns (serifs and assist features) and the pattern densities are high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are currently used in many EUV lithography simulators. [9][10][11] An implicit assumption of the pattern decomposition method in the models is that the mask pattern is large and isolated. However, optical proximity correction (OPC) masks are decorated by small patterns (serifs and assist features) and the pattern densities are high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPC-litho models for these tight pitch layers must comprehend full-field EUV effects such as non-telecentricity of the slit, flare, and black border [3]. OPC model errors need to scale with the edge placement requirements of each technology node.…”
Section: Optics and Resist Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the absorber thickness, which is large compared to the wavelength, and the oblique incidence contribute to a pronounced shadowing and other mask topography effects [5]. The mask shadowing effect is orientation-dependent relying on the mask topography, which induces a directional CD bias and shift on the order of several nanometers [5,6]. In contrast with a 22-nm or smaller half-pitch, the mask shadowing effect is too pronounced to be ignored and must be compensated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the past, a set of approaches were developed to resolve the imaging degradation attributed to flare [13][14][15], while some other methods were used to compensate the effect of shadowing or off-axis incidence [16][17][18][19]. Recently, comprehensive OPC methods incorporating OPE, flare, photoresist, and mask shadowing models in the optimization flow have been proposed so as to jointly consider these effects [5,[20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, most of these EUV OPC approaches are edge-based, which only move the segments of mask edges to optimize the imaging performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation