2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cdc40024.2019.9030250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opacity of Networked Discrete Event Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for networked control systems, the information transmission between controllers and plants in the feedback loops may also be released to the intruder. There are some very recent works on the verification of opacity for networked control systems using finite-state models; see, e.g., [222,214,238,107,213]. However, existing works on formal verification of networked control system mainly focus on the mission requirements [231,69,146,28] and to the best of our knowledge, there is no result on formal verification of opacity for general networked CPS.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for networked control systems, the information transmission between controllers and plants in the feedback loops may also be released to the intruder. There are some very recent works on the verification of opacity for networked control systems using finite-state models; see, e.g., [222,214,238,107,213]. However, existing works on formal verification of networked control system mainly focus on the mission requirements [231,69,146,28] and to the best of our knowledge, there is no result on formal verification of opacity for general networked CPS.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, by modeling the system as a probabilistic finite state automaton, [17]- [20] investigate the verification of opacity in the context of stochastic DES, where the violation of opacity is characterized by the probability, not a binary value (0 or 1) as in the case of a non-stochastic DES. Furthermore, the investigation on the verification of opacity has also been extended to networked DES recently in [21], [22], where the communication delays and losses in the observation channel and the control channel have been taken into consideration. Readers could refer to [23], [24] for a more comprehensive literature review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when a given system is not opaque, its opacity enforcement problem has been extensively investigated using a variety of techniques, including supervisory control [14,15,16], insertion or edit functions [17,18,19,20], dynamic observers [21], etc. Recently, verification and/or enforcement of opacity have been extended to other classes of settings, including Petri nets [22,23,24], stochastic systems [25,26,27], modular systems [28], networked systems [29,30], etc. In recent literature [31,32], the authors studied opacity preserving (bi)simulation relations using an abstractionbased technique for nondeterministic transition systems and metric systems, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%