2022
DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-algologie2022v43a12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oospore Features among Morphologically Similar and Closely Related Charophyte Species: Consistency and Variability

Abstract: Directeur De la publication / Publication director : Bruno DAVID Président du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle réDactrice en chef / editor-in-chief : Line le Gall Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle assistante De réDaction / assistant editor : Chris LE COQUET-LE ROUX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The environments colonized not only affected population dynamics and persistence, but also the vegetative structures [14] of the two species occurring in both rivers and ponds, where C. gymnophylla and C. vulgaris occurred with different morphotypes. The size of gametangia, especially oosporangia, does not appear to vary in relation to the colonized environment, although variations in oospores have recently been reported by Milovanović et al [38] for C. globularis populations growing in different sites in continental Europe, characterized by different water chemistries and stabilities. In this context, the intraspecific differentiation of both C. gymnophylla and C. vulgaris into different morphotypes, as well as the clear-cut separation between the species is remarkable, considering the long-standing debate on the validity of the former as a taxonomical entity distinguished from the latter [16,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The environments colonized not only affected population dynamics and persistence, but also the vegetative structures [14] of the two species occurring in both rivers and ponds, where C. gymnophylla and C. vulgaris occurred with different morphotypes. The size of gametangia, especially oosporangia, does not appear to vary in relation to the colonized environment, although variations in oospores have recently been reported by Milovanović et al [38] for C. globularis populations growing in different sites in continental Europe, characterized by different water chemistries and stabilities. In this context, the intraspecific differentiation of both C. gymnophylla and C. vulgaris into different morphotypes, as well as the clear-cut separation between the species is remarkable, considering the long-standing debate on the validity of the former as a taxonomical entity distinguished from the latter [16,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Samples from each population were transported to the laboratory in plastic buckets with their own water and processed for further analyses within one day from collection. Morphological characteristics were employed as diagnostic features for stonewort identification at the species level [19,38], the classification of which relied on the dichotomous keys of Bazzichelli and Abdelahad [45] and Urbaniak and G ąbka [46], and on the current nomenclature reported in AlgaeBase [16] and in the World Checklist of Selected Plant Families [47]. Morphological analyses were performed through image analysis, using ImageJ 1.8.0 software, on 5 thalli per population, fixed and preserved in formalin-acetic acid-alcohol (FAA) solution at 4 °C [48] in line with similar studies [4,14].…”
Section: Algae Identification and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations