International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/saint.2006.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology extraction from tables on the Web

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current version of Project Organizer demands a lot of manual work by the project manager and some dorm of automation such as automatic metadata extraction from semi-structured tables [8] is needed to ease this burden.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current version of Project Organizer demands a lot of manual work by the project manager and some dorm of automation such as automatic metadata extraction from semi-structured tables [8] is needed to ease this burden.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have reported their work on extracting information from the web table [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. In [1][2], Jung et al used a machine learning algorithm C4.5 to separate the table head from the body according to rows and columns' characteristics [1], and complemented the head extraction method with supplementary heuristic rules [2].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tijerino et al [22] described the automatic generation of ontologies from the normalized tables, which is a structure they got after normalizing table-equivalent data. Tanaka et al [23] proposed a method for extracting relations based on interpretations given by humans, in order to interpret structures of each tables correctly. This method is easy to apply to tables in various domains because it uses interpretations given by humans and generalized table structures instead of a domain-specific knowledge base.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%