2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-011-0418-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology driven search of compound IDs

Abstract: Abstract. Object identification is a crucial step in most information systems. Nowadays, we have many different ways to identify entities such as surrogates, keys and object identifiers. However, not all of them guarantee the entity identity. Many works have been introduced in the literature for discovering meaningful identifiers (i.e., guaranteeing the entity identity according to the semantics of the universe of discourse), but all of them work at the logical or data level and they share some constraints inh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers prefer to use ad hoc algorithms on top of more mature Standard services. Thus, for example, Abelló and Romero [36], [37] incur higher Computation because of implementing ad hoc algorithms on top of the reasoner. We think that constraining or at least detecting some kind of expressions (e.g., MD queries) in the reasoners could be a solution to the puzzle (i.e., similar to detecting star-join patterns in relational query optimizers).…”
Section: Semantic and Computational Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers prefer to use ad hoc algorithms on top of more mature Standard services. Thus, for example, Abelló and Romero [36], [37] incur higher Computation because of implementing ad hoc algorithms on top of the reasoner. We think that constraining or at least detecting some kind of expressions (e.g., MD queries) in the reasoners could be a solution to the puzzle (i.e., similar to detecting star-join patterns in relational query optimizers).…”
Section: Semantic and Computational Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abelló and Romero [36] examine the ontology to look for MD identifiers (in order to identify facts), which is known to be expensive in the general case due to the large amount of instances a DW must deal with. To yield a tractable complexity, this work proposes the use of a reference ontology to pre-identify candidates and drastically reduce the number of tests (i.e., data samplings) to be carried out.…”
Section: Ontologies For Domain Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism is already used in SW environments and BI 2.0 systems can strongly benefit from it. Furthermore, when having several metadata models related to the metamodel we can more efficiently sample metadata as the search space for the same elements is significantly reduced (see [3]) when starting from the metamodel types. This eliminates the need for classical sampling that is too computationally expansive for the large metadata volumes expected in BI 2.0.…”
Section: Fig 32: Class and Instance Concept Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The related properties are illustrated in Figure 5. 3 general, the roll-up from and hierarchy concepts can be inferred from a sequence of OLAP operations, however their explicit representations makes the ROLL-UP operation model self-contained such that it can be easily shared. The SM4MQ representation of the ROLL-UP example from Section 2 of aggregating data from the month to the year level over the running example schema is illustrated in Figure 5.4.…”
Section: Roll-up and Drill-down Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation