2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2018.8593566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation for Increased Skill Reusability in Industrial Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12: An automotive supplier's shop floor analytics dashboard showing the maximum measured fuse mounting forces in Z in the end effector frame for each PickAndPlaceTask in one execution of process P1 (top) and across different assemblies for slot 9 (bottom). For the mounting of mini fuses (11)(12)(13)18) higher maximum Z forces were measured than for regular ATO fuses (3-5, 9, 14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12: An automotive supplier's shop floor analytics dashboard showing the maximum measured fuse mounting forces in Z in the end effector frame for each PickAndPlaceTask in one execution of process P1 (top) and across different assemblies for slot 9 (bottom). For the mounting of mini fuses (11)(12)(13)18) higher maximum Z forces were measured than for regular ATO fuses (3-5, 9, 14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Many approaches follow the product-processresources paradigm (PPR) [6], in which products [7] and product designs [8], production processes [9], and manufacturing resources [10] are modeled. The combination of skills and explicit knowledge representation is often used to reduce the complexity of programming production systems [9], [11], [12]. In [13], a CAD-based instruction of assembly tasks is described.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True (e.g., maximisation of human convenience, or for a restaurant runner task, the time at which a new client approaches a table serves as a deadline for cleaning the table) The types of jobs/tasks can have dedicated schedule parameters False, processes have priorities which can be directly compared True, various da class agents can compute different schedule parameters which can be transformed and compared with each other by tha class agent (e.g., object transportation uses the shortest travel distance, and human guidance maximises human convenience) Hard restriction of deadlines Available Depends on the robot application: for social and service robots, the deadlines can be fuzzy 4) evaluate metrics for task scheduling quality evaluation, 5) provide an adaptation mechanism for the scheduling algorithm to enable learning of the priorities of tasks based on the user's intentions [71], [72], 6) design an ontology for the robot task harmonisation problem that facilitates the configuration of the schedule parameters (according to robot skill reconfiguration [73]), 7) conduct tests with end users within the INCARE project [74], and 8) integrate our architecture with one of the formally defined task models featured with consistent language for scheduling algorithm specification and planning method [59].…”
Section: Falsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these projects, the ontology has been used to enhance cognitive abilities of robots that are required to plan and execute assembly tasks. The core ontology has been reorganized after the initial release (Jacobsson et al , 2016), and new case studies on robot programming support (Topp & Malec, 2018) and skill reusability in industrial scenarios (Topp et al , 2018) have been developed.…”
Section: Ontologies To Support Robot Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, ontologies are used to support the kinesthetic teaching so that the learned primitives are sematically represented as skills (Stenmark et al , 2018). Second, (Topp et al , 2018) discuss how the representation of already learned robot’s skills enhances the transfer of knowledge from one robot to others.…”
Section: Ontologies To Support Robot Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%