2010 IEEE 15th Conference on Emerging Technologies &Amp; Factory Automation (ETFA 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2010.5641192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology-based fault diagnosis for industrial control applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of Relevant Runtime Failure Types: in the first process step, domain experts have to discuss and identify the relevant runtime failure types that should be detectable using the proposed approach [6]. Based on their experience, the domain experts select the runtime failure types that by now are not easy to detect using traditional methods.…”
Section: Runtime Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of Relevant Runtime Failure Types: in the first process step, domain experts have to discuss and identify the relevant runtime failure types that should be detectable using the proposed approach [6]. Based on their experience, the domain experts select the runtime failure types that by now are not easy to detect using traditional methods.…”
Section: Runtime Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the design time model, we use the P&ID (Piping and Instrumentation Diagram) of the educational model of an industrial process plant located in the Odo-StrugerLaboratory 2 . As described in detail in [7] and [8], the tank model consists of two tanks, T101 and T102, which are situated on different height levels. The lower tank (T101) contains three level sensors (a critical upper level (B114), a lower level (B104), and a critical lower level lever (B113)), a heater (E104), and a temperature sensor (S111).…”
Section: A General Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scenarios were originally described in [7] and [8], in this paper we used them as example for real-life usage scenarios of the proposed transformation approach for the transformation of design time safety requirements to rules which can be used to enforce these safety requirements at runtime.…”
Section: Exemplary Runtime Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is also an important process in the implementation of data integration technology [26]. The semantic data mapping process is the standardization and mapping process to produce uniformity between data with various data representation, heterogeneity format data and different semantic aspect between applications in the different data sources [27][28][29]. In the current days, there are a lot of technologies and tools in term of semantic data mapping process, and this research is to compare and analyze the existing semantic data mapping technology and tools based on several criteria's [23,24,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%