2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59336-4_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology-Based Data Access for Extracting Event Logs from Legacy Data: The onprom Tool and Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of the scores of the three individual predictors (Eqs. 16,17,18) in a single scoring function of log interestingness (Eq. 19) is what we call our Custom Predictor (CP).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Predictors' Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of the scores of the three individual predictors (Eqs. 16,17,18) in a single scoring function of log interestingness (Eq. 19) is what we call our Custom Predictor (CP).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Predictors' Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing techniques are ad-hoc solutions for ERP and SAP architectures and do not provide a general approach for event log building from databases. Another initiative for event log extraction is the onprom project [15][16][17]. The focus is on event log extraction by means of ontology-based data access (OBDA).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts from the database area also have links to processes. In [7], the authors propose an approach based on describing event logs with annotations of a conceptual model of the data. The technique takes as an input (i) an ontology in the Web Ontology Language (OWL) language; (ii) an Ontology-based Data Access (OBDA) mapping specification; (iii) and the schema annotations specifying cases and events [8].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing literature has addressed several challenges of automatic matching. Two main techniques are case matching [17,6] and mapping [3,7] of events to activities at different abstraction layers. Case matching approaches strive to reconstruct case identifiers compatible with eXtensible Event Stream (XES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, [24] and [32] perform semantic modelling and integration of the resulting process maps with annotated terms and then present the domain knowledge for the activities (i.e attributes or concepts) as defined within the ontology using process description languages such as the OWL [7] and SWRL [8]. Indeed, reasoning on ontological knowledge plays an important role in semantic representation of processes [33] by allowing for extraction and conversion of explicit information into some implicit information. For example, the intersection or union of classes, description of relationships and concepts assertions.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%