2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10506-005-4159-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontologies of Professional Legal Knowledge as the Basis for Intelligent IT Support for Judges

Abstract: In this paper, we describe the use of legal ontologies as a basis to improve IT support for professional judges. As opposed to most legal ontologies designed so far, which are mostly based on dogmatic and normative knowledge, we emphasize the importance of professional knowledge and experience as an important pillar for constructing the ontology. We describe an intelligent FAQ system for junior judges that intensively use the ontology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(iii) have semantic indexing and search, such as the ontologies of French codes (Lame, 2002), ontologies which represent cases of financial fraud (Leary, Vandenberghe & Zeleznikow, 2004) or which develop an intelligent FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) system for judges (Benjamins et al, 2003;Casanovas, Casellas & Vallbé, 2008);…”
Section: Legal Ontologies and Subontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) have semantic indexing and search, such as the ontologies of French codes (Lame, 2002), ontologies which represent cases of financial fraud (Leary, Vandenberghe & Zeleznikow, 2004) or which develop an intelligent FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) system for judges (Benjamins et al, 2003;Casanovas, Casellas & Vallbé, 2008);…”
Section: Legal Ontologies and Subontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, gathered several data about the Spanish junior judges' needs, concerns, and problems, concluding that this should be a relevant topic to consider in future research since the on-call service "raises many problems and doubts" among judges (Benjamins et al 2004b). For instance, gathered several data about the Spanish junior judges' needs, concerns, and problems, concluding that this should be a relevant topic to consider in future research since the on-call service "raises many problems and doubts" among judges (Benjamins et al 2004b).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, provided a discussion on both selection and evaluation mechanisms in the Spanish judicial system, within the context of a wide research program on the application and impact of information technologies and knowledge management systems in the Spanish legal-specially judicial-system (see also Casanovas et al 2003;Benjamins et al 2004bBenjamins et al , 2005Casellas 2008). In this context, provided a discussion on both selection and evaluation mechanisms in the Spanish judicial system, within the context of a wide research program on the application and impact of information technologies and knowledge management systems in the Spanish legal-specially judicial-system (see also Casanovas et al 2003;Benjamins et al 2004bBenjamins et al , 2005Casellas 2008).…”
Section: Access To the Judicial Professional Careermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IT support for junior judges was improved by legal ontologies using an intelligent FAQ system. The system emphasizes the importance of professional knowledge and their experience as an important pillar for constructing the ontology [22]. The METHONTOLOGY methodology is used for ontology building in the legal domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%