2014
DOI: 10.1111/curi.12036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontologies of Place, Creative Meaning Making and Critical Cosmopolitan Education

Abstract: Discourses of globalization and cosmopolitanism, focusing on the rapid flows of people, resources, and knowledge around the globe and subsequent encounters between global citizens, present a binary between "global" and "local." At the same time educational theories, perhaps especially in the areas of language and literacy studies, promote a view of learning as occurring through mediated interactions in local, situated practices. This article offers a lens to bridge perspectives between ever-increasing global s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…My prior studies on secondary school transnational education found that the epistemological configurations about regional parochialism, mono-mode and mono-lingual literacy, and national identities have less interpretive power to account for transnational education students' lived experience and identity formation in cross-border learning spaces (Zhang, 2015;Zhang & Heydon, 2014, 2015. I therefore anchored my study in the scholarly work on cosmopolitan approaches to literacy education (e.g., Hawkins, 2014;Hull & Stornaiuolo, 2010Saito, 2010;Vasudevan, 2014;WahlstrÖm, 2014) that focuses on engaging students in the interlocution between locality and globality. Reflecting the 4th Century BC notion of cosmopolitan, Beck (2002) foregrounds three features of cosmopolitanism, namely, globality, plurality, and civility.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My prior studies on secondary school transnational education found that the epistemological configurations about regional parochialism, mono-mode and mono-lingual literacy, and national identities have less interpretive power to account for transnational education students' lived experience and identity formation in cross-border learning spaces (Zhang, 2015;Zhang & Heydon, 2014, 2015. I therefore anchored my study in the scholarly work on cosmopolitan approaches to literacy education (e.g., Hawkins, 2014;Hull & Stornaiuolo, 2010Saito, 2010;Vasudevan, 2014;WahlstrÖm, 2014) that focuses on engaging students in the interlocution between locality and globality. Reflecting the 4th Century BC notion of cosmopolitan, Beck (2002) foregrounds three features of cosmopolitanism, namely, globality, plurality, and civility.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers have the potential to discuss with students the relationships and the tensions in loyalties to the local, the regional, the national, and the global (Delanty, 2006;Delores, 1998;Gough, 2014;Hawkins, 2014).…”
Section: Framework Of Global Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might wonder if what we are suggesting is a kind of critical cosmopolitanism (Hawkins, 2014), cosmopolitanism from the ground (Hansen, 2010), or cosmopolitanism from below (Hall, 2006). According to Hawkins (2014), this orientation does acknowledge the ways that historical and current contexts and conditions "mediate what happens, and who people [can] be and become, within them" (p. 107). However, in spite of their attention to those who may be less powerful or those who have not voluntarily chosen to move across national boundaries (e.g.…”
Section: Beyond Multiculturalismmentioning
confidence: 99%