2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0269888909990026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontological modeling at a domain interface: bridging clinical and biomolecular knowledge

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss the challenges posed by the NEUROWEB project, as a case study of ontological modeling at a knowledge interface between neurovascular medicine and genomics. The aim of the project is the development of a support system for association studies. We identify the notion of clinical phenotypes, that is, the pathological condition of a patient, as the central construct of the knowledge model. Clinical phenotypes are assessed through the diagnostic activity, performed by clinical experts oper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar approaches have been described also in different domains, i.e., in the medical domain. The Neuroweb Reference ontology (Colombo et al, 2009) is an upper level schema and enables a specific infrastructure to operate over different clinical repositories and to retrieve patients based on a set of specific criteria. This ontology acts as a vocabulary by encoding in a common way the phenotypes (the pathological condition of a patient) of different patients coming from different repositories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar approaches have been described also in different domains, i.e., in the medical domain. The Neuroweb Reference ontology (Colombo et al, 2009) is an upper level schema and enables a specific infrastructure to operate over different clinical repositories and to retrieve patients based on a set of specific criteria. This ontology acts as a vocabulary by encoding in a common way the phenotypes (the pathological condition of a patient) of different patients coming from different repositories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%