2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-007-9114-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogeny of the Defensive Stinging Behavior of the Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These coincidences of venom physiology and exploratory behavior likely result in foraging efficiency benefits for H. saltator, as they lead to workers which are fully equipped (or nearly so) around the time they begin their foraging careers, and the workers that are the most dedicated to foraging are, at least initially, the most physiologically able to handle a higher prey encounter rate. A similar correlation between venom physiology and defensive behavior was also found in the fire ant, S. invicta; defensiveness (number of stings delivered and venom delivered per sting) peaked around the age workers finished venom production, i.e., when their venom sacs were full and they were therefore the most physiologically suitable nest defenders (Haight, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…These coincidences of venom physiology and exploratory behavior likely result in foraging efficiency benefits for H. saltator, as they lead to workers which are fully equipped (or nearly so) around the time they begin their foraging careers, and the workers that are the most dedicated to foraging are, at least initially, the most physiologically able to handle a higher prey encounter rate. A similar correlation between venom physiology and defensive behavior was also found in the fire ant, S. invicta; defensiveness (number of stings delivered and venom delivered per sting) peaked around the age workers finished venom production, i.e., when their venom sacs were full and they were therefore the most physiologically suitable nest defenders (Haight, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The similarly aged workers of the singlecohort colonies must divide labor between nest tasks and foraging, removing the influence of any age-based behavioral bias. Although this robust approach has been widely used in honey bee research (Nelson, 1927;Robinson et al, 1989;Huang and Robinson, 1995), single-cohort experiments are rare in ant research (Gronenberg et al, 1996;Haight, 2006;Haight, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller workers may require more insertion attempts before they are able to achieve satisfactory penetration. Considering this, and because there is no correlation between worker size and the total number of stings delivered over all sting bouts (Haight 2008), the evidence suggesting a fundamental size-related difference in the defensive effort of S. invicta workers seems weak. So, in S. invictaÕs case, the dubbing of any particular Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%