1986
DOI: 10.1128/iai.52.1.236-239.1986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogeny of macrophage function to release superoxide anion in conventional and germfree mice

Abstract: To deterinne whether the presence of bacterial flora contributes to the ontogenic development of macrophage function, the ability of macrophages to release superoxide anion (O2-) in response to stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate was compared in conventional and germfree mice of various ages after birth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the role of these microorganisms or their products in the inductive phase has not been supported by studies in germ-free mice, since they develop colitis in response to DSS (2). On the other hand, germ-free mice have altered macrophage functions and may not be comparable in their reactivity with those that have been exposed to intestinal flora since birth (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the role of these microorganisms or their products in the inductive phase has not been supported by studies in germ-free mice, since they develop colitis in response to DSS (2). On the other hand, germ-free mice have altered macrophage functions and may not be comparable in their reactivity with those that have been exposed to intestinal flora since birth (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teeth, gingival sulcus, gingiva, tongue, cheek, lip, hard and soft palate are all microbial habitats that are colonized by distinct microbial communities which form biofilms of different complexities (Mager et al, 2003;Aas et al, 2005). Those biofilms protect the host against pathogens through mechanisms such as competition for nutrients (Momose et al, 2008) or adhesion receptors (Servin and Coconnier, 2003), production of inhibitory metabolites or anti-microbial agents against pathogens (Servin, 2004), modulation of toxin production or action (Czerucka et al, 1994;Brandão et al, 1998), and modifying inflammatory responses (Starling and Balish, 1981;Mitsuyama et al, 1986;Ohkubo et al, 1990;Clarke et al, 2010;Fagundes et al, 2012).…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Oral Mucosa And Its Colonizing Microbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer from the experimental literature is clearly the nature and intensity of microbial stimulation from the environment, in particular the gut flora and its counterpart in the upper respiratory tract. Aside from providing maturation signals for local T-cell-dependent immune function(s) at niucosal surfaces (761, the microbial flora stimulate the functional maturation of the seticuloendothelial system throughout the body, including distal macrophage populations such as those in the peritoneal cavity (77)(78)(79) and also in the lung (80-81). Denial (or reduction) of these maturational signals via maintenance of animals in artificial germ free or pathogen-free states markedly inhibits development of both the effector function(s) of macrophage populations (such as mediator secretion), as well as their capacity to respond to activation stimuli (77-8 1 ), and would accordingly be likely to reduce their effectiveness in cell-cell interactions such as those described in Fig.…”
Section: Infections and Primary Allergic Sensitisation During Infancymentioning
confidence: 99%