2015
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogeny of 3D rib curvature and its importance for the understanding of human thorax development

Abstract: These results suggest anatomical constraints for ontogenetic rib variation, since ribs 1-7 (true ribs) are directly linked to the sternum. Moreover, these results are supported by functional anatomy because pulmonary kinematics would influence the upper unit and diaphragmatic kinematics would influence the lower one. Our findings are relevant not only to understanding how changes at individual ribs contribute to the adult thorax morphology, but also to the development and evolution of the modern human rib cage. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The post-processing of the 3D surface models of skeletal elements (cleaning, smoothing and mesh hole-filling) was carried out by the Artec Studio v12 software (www.Artec3D.com) and the final 3D costal models were imported into the Viewbox4 software (www.dhal.com) for digitization. Then landmarks and semilandmarks for sliding 74–76 were located on rib models following previous published protocols from García-Martínez et al 77 . Since some fossil specimens (Tabun 1, Kebara 2 and ATD6 hominins) did not preserve the rib head, the three landmarks which described that structure in the comparative costal sample were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The post-processing of the 3D surface models of skeletal elements (cleaning, smoothing and mesh hole-filling) was carried out by the Artec Studio v12 software (www.Artec3D.com) and the final 3D costal models were imported into the Viewbox4 software (www.dhal.com) for digitization. Then landmarks and semilandmarks for sliding 74–76 were located on rib models following previous published protocols from García-Martínez et al 77 . Since some fossil specimens (Tabun 1, Kebara 2 and ATD6 hominins) did not preserve the rib head, the three landmarks which described that structure in the comparative costal sample were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant decreases in the transverse diameters were found at T4 in both superior and inferior endplates in males and significant increases in superior and inferior endplates in both genders were found below the T4 level. The decrease in the transverse diameter toward T4 and the increase from T4 was highlighted in the aforementioned study by Masharawi et al and this finding was discussed from evolutionary, kinematic and biomechanical aspects . These sandglass‐type changes in the transverse diameter may also be explained by influence of adjacent organs in the posterior mediastinum, especially arch of aorta and descending aorta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The present study has some limitations. First, each rib pair was marked using only seven landmarks, which is much fewer than used in previous studies: landmarks and various semi‐landmarks were provided in earlier studies . Thus, the rib morphology assessed in the present study may reflect the gross features of rib morphology but not reveal each rib precisely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such morphological differences of rib pairs according to the position along the cranial‐caudal axis constitute important factors for proper anatomical and functional construction of the rib cage. The whole thorax cage has been analyzed via quantitative morphometric studies in which each rib was integrated as a component …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%