2010
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.020271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogenetic scaling of locomotor kinetics and kinematics of the ostrich (Struthio camelus)

Abstract: SUMMARYKinematic and kinetic parameters of running gait were investigated through growth in the ostrich, from two weeks up to 10 months of age, in order to investigate the effects of increasing body size. Ontogenetic scaling relationships were compared with published scaling relationships found to exist with increasing body size between species to determine whether dynamic similarity is maintained during growth. During the study, ostrich mass ( ), significantly exceeding the close to geometric scaling observed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Rubenson and colleagues (2004) and Abourachid and Renous (2000) used sub-adult ostriches. The normalized stride length and frequency characteristics have been found to change through ontogeny (Smith et al, 2010). Nonetheless, the overall trends of stride length and frequency with speed are remarkably consistent across studies, despite differences in data collection.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Walking and Running In Ostrichesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, Rubenson and colleagues (2004) and Abourachid and Renous (2000) used sub-adult ostriches. The normalized stride length and frequency characteristics have been found to change through ontogeny (Smith et al, 2010). Nonetheless, the overall trends of stride length and frequency with speed are remarkably consistent across studies, despite differences in data collection.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Walking and Running In Ostrichesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Consequently, the ostrich has served as an important animal model for understanding bipedal gait dynamics and energetics (Fedak and Seeherman, 1979;Alexander et al, 1979;Abourachid and Renous, 2000;Rubenson et al, 2004;Smith et al, 2010;Watson et al, 2011;Smith and Wilson, 2013), and as an inspiration for the design of legged robots (Andrada et al, 2012;Cotton et al, 2012). Here, we measured self-selected gait dynamics of ostriches roaming in a 165×120 m grassy paddock over a wide range of speeds using GPS-IMU sensors, and compared freely selected gait-speed distributions with those reported previously from standard biomechanics laboratory measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, available data on large Struthioniformes (Abourachid and Renous, 2000;Rubenson et al, 2007;Goetz et al, 2008;Schaller et al, 2009;Smith et al, 2010) suggest that across the entire class Aves, it is mainly body size, leading to a differing degree of crouch and elongation of relative distal limb length, that constrains the kinematic pattern (Gatesy and Pollard, 2011) (A.S., B. M. Kilbourne and M.S.F., unpublished). Looking at small species exhibiting rather similar intralimb proportions, a consistent pattern of intralimb coordination can be observed, supporting the initial hypothesis.…”
Section: Conserved Pattern Of Intralimb Coordination In Fore-aft Motimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, knowledge of intralimb coordination of avian terrestrial locomotion is restricted to guinea fowl (Gatesy, 1999a;Gatesy, 1999b), chicken (Jacobson and Hollyday, 1982;Manion, 1984;Muir et al, 1996), quail (Reilly, 2000;Abourachid et al, 2011), pigeon (Cracraft, 1971), magpie (Verstappen et al, 2000) and several Struthioniformes (e.g. Abourachid and Renous, 2000;Jindrich et al, 2007;Rubenson et al, 2007;Smith et al, 2010). Although Gatesy (Gatesy, 1999a) demonstrated the necessity of applying X-ray technology for an accurate and reproducible analysis of the kinematics of avian terrestrial locomotion, very few studies have since used this method in analyses of avian bipedalism (Abourachid et al, 2011;Provini et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the other birds 99 have three or four toes, while the largest avian biped ostrich has only two toes, the main 3rd 100 toe and the lateral 4th toe. Another unique adaptation at the distal part of the hindlimb is the 101 supra-jointed toe posture with the metatarsophalangeal joint and proximal phalanx of both 102 toes being permanently elevated above the ground surface (Schaller, et al, 2011;Deeming, 103 2003 (Schaller et al, 2007(Schaller et al, , 2011 Although a large number of studies have been conducted to investigate the ostrich hindlimb 112 kinematics during locomotion (Haughton, 1865;Alexander et al, 1979;Alexander, 1985;113 Gatesy and Biewener, 1991;Abourachid and Renous, 2000;Jindrich et al, 2007;Rubenson 114 et al, 2004Rubenson 114 et al, , 2007Rubenson 114 et al, , 2010Watson et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2006Smith et al, , 2007Smith et al, , 2010Smith et al, , 2013Schaller et 115 al., 2009Schaller et 115 al., , 2011Birn-Jeffery et al, 2014;Hutchinson et al, 2015), those kinematic analyses 116 were mainly focused on hip, knee and ankle joints. So far, little is known about the relative 117 motions of the 3rd and 4th toes intrinsic joints and the metatarsophalangeal joint during 118 ostrich foot locomotion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%