2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogenetic changes to muscle architectural properties within the jaw‐adductor musculature of Macaca fascicularis

Abstract: Larger individuals demonstrate adaptations during development towards maximizing gape potential and bite force potential at both an anterior and posterior bitepoint. These data provide anatomical evidence to support field observations of dietary and behavioral differences between juvenile and adult M. fascicularis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(172 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During ontogeny, the structure and function of masticatory muscles are necessary for the proper development of the mammalian TMJ, as well as mastication performance [13,16]. Moreover, the biomechanical input from the masticatory muscles is required during adulthood to maintain the homeostasis of the joint [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During ontogeny, the structure and function of masticatory muscles are necessary for the proper development of the mammalian TMJ, as well as mastication performance [13,16]. Moreover, the biomechanical input from the masticatory muscles is required during adulthood to maintain the homeostasis of the joint [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arrangement of muscle fascicles within the masticatory apparatus has been shown to correlate with dietary adaptations in both primates (Perry and Wall, ; Eng et al, ; Taylor and Vinyard, ; Perry and Hartstone‐Rose, ; Perry et al, ; Perry et al, ; Hartstone‐Rose et al, ) and other mammals (Taylor et al, ; Herrel et al, ; Hartstone‐Rose et al, ; Santana and Cheung, ; Fabre et al, ; Curtis and Santana, ; Santana, ). Despite our understanding of the relationship between fascicular architecture and masticatory function, however, few studies have considered how this architecture changes throughout the lifetime of an animal (Huhov et al, ; Langenbach and Weijs, ; Pfaller et al, ; Pfaller et al, ), especially within the primate order (though see Dickinson et al, ). Importantly, characterizing the architectural properties of muscles at various stages of life could provide valuable insights into dynamic functional demands throughout ontogeny and its impact upon the masticatory apparatus.…”
Section: Ontogeny Within Microcebus Murinusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these inquiries, we have a better understanding of (1) the uniformity within different portions of the masticatory muscles (Antón, ), (2) the way that masticatory muscles are adapted to overcome mechanically disadvantaged leverages (e.g., prognathic faces; Antón, ; Antón, ), (3) the allometric scaling of the architectural properties of masticatory muscles (Anapol et al, ; Perry and Wall, ; Perry et al, ; Hartstone‐Rose et al, ), and (4) the correlations between masticatory muscle architecture and dietary processing and acquisition (Eng et al, ; Taylor and Vinyard, ; Perry et al, ; Hartstone‐Rose et al, ). However, only a few studies of primates have sought to clarify how these architectural properties might develop and change throughout the life of the animal (Carlson, ; Cachel, ; Dickinson et al, ; Prufrock and Perry, ).…”
Section: Ontogeny Within Microcebus Murinusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prediction 4: the magnitude of integration in the face and the mandibular ramus complex will increase throughout ontogeny as muscle mass and related loadings increase (Dickinson, Fitton, & Kupczik, 2018). For instance, muscle mass in the jaw‐adductor muscle (e.g., temporalis muscle) shows positive allometry throughout ontogeny in M. fascicularis (Dickinson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%