2020
DOI: 10.21083/partnership.v15i2.6213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontario Public Library Websites and the Framing of Disability

Abstract: An environment may be technically accessible, in that it complies with accessibility legislation or makes space for those with disabilities, but that does not guarantee equality. A space or experience can be technically accessible according to a standard and still be unusable, difficult to use or not perceived to be inclusive of those with disabilities. This research takes this understanding of ‘technically accessible’ in order to examine a set of medium-sized Ontario public library websites. Overall, findings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these minimum standards are also developed through a negotiated understanding of what would make a particular environment accessible. An organization, however, can be technically accessible within the law, but not be user friendly or inclusive of those with disabilities (Hill, 2020;Byerley and Chambers, 2002;McCord et al, 2002;Byerley et al, 2007;Blechner, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, these minimum standards are also developed through a negotiated understanding of what would make a particular environment accessible. An organization, however, can be technically accessible within the law, but not be user friendly or inclusive of those with disabilities (Hill, 2020;Byerley and Chambers, 2002;McCord et al, 2002;Byerley et al, 2007;Blechner, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a small amount of literature focused on the physical environment (Hughes, 2017;Hill, 2011;Copeland, 2011;Lazar and Briggs, 2015). Another small portion of the literature looks at how accessibility is discussed on library websites and databases (Hill, 2020;Power and LeBeau, 2009;Graves and German, 2018;Gabel et al, 2016;Cassner, Maxey-Harris and Anaya, 2011). A newer aspect of the literature has been the examination of the library as a workplace for people with disabilities (Oud, 2019;Pionke, 2019Pionke, , 2020Schomberg and Highby, 2020).…”
Section: Disability and Accessibility In Lismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web pages are acceptable text for content analysis as they meet seven criteria: cohesion, coherence, intentionality, acceptability, informativity, situationality, and intertextuality (Beaugrande & Dressler in White & Marsh, 2006). Hill (2020) and Moynihan and Clarke (2022) previously used content analysis of Ontario public library websites to investigate research questions about Ontario public libraries.…”
Section: Ontario Public Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%