1995
DOI: 10.1080/03091929508228957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Onset of convection in a rapidly rotating compressible fluid spherical shell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
24
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
24
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Gilman and Glatzmaier (1981) and Glatzmaier and Gilman (1981a) used the anelastic equations to investigate the onset of convection and nonlinear convection in a rotating spherical shell geometry. Drew et al (1995) extended the Glatzmaier and Gilman (1981a) linear stability analysis to reach larger Taylor numbers and a broader range of Prandtl numbers; surprisingly, they observed negative critical Rayleigh numbers for sufficiently small Prandtl numbers in both the spherical shell and plane layer geometry. Whereas many studies have performed one-to-one comparisons of the anelastic and compressible equations for investigating stably stratified gravity wave dynamics (e.g., Davies et al 2003, Klein et al 2010, Brown et al 2012), there appears to be few comparisons in the literature between the two equation sets for the unstably stratified case of thermal convection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Gilman and Glatzmaier (1981) and Glatzmaier and Gilman (1981a) used the anelastic equations to investigate the onset of convection and nonlinear convection in a rotating spherical shell geometry. Drew et al (1995) extended the Glatzmaier and Gilman (1981a) linear stability analysis to reach larger Taylor numbers and a broader range of Prandtl numbers; surprisingly, they observed negative critical Rayleigh numbers for sufficiently small Prandtl numbers in both the spherical shell and plane layer geometry. Whereas many studies have performed one-to-one comparisons of the anelastic and compressible equations for investigating stably stratified gravity wave dynamics (e.g., Davies et al 2003, Klein et al 2010, Brown et al 2012), there appears to be few comparisons in the literature between the two equation sets for the unstably stratified case of thermal convection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One of their important discoveries was that the depth-dependence of the thermal conductivity strongly influences the localization of the region where the convective instability first sets in and in the case when thermal diffusivity is assumed constant, anelastic convection develops small structures close to the outer boundary. The onset of compressible convection in spherical geometry with constant kinematic or dynamic viscosity was also investigated by Drew et al (1995) and an asymptotic linear theory under the anelastic approximation was developed for rapidly rotating spherical shells by . A very detailed derivation and comprehensive discussion of the compressible convection equations in the geophysical context was presented by Braginsky and Roberts (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus find that the range of stratification for which the AE can approximate the NSE becomes increasingly small as the Prandtl number is reduced. As first noted by Drew et al [24], the Taylor number is required to be sufficiently large to observe the spurious behaviour of the AE. For Pr = 0.1 and N ρ = 5, the AE yield critical parameters that closely approximate the NSE critical parameters up to Ta ≈ 10 8 .…”
Section: Geostrophy)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of the anelastic study of [24], there have been no investigations of rapidly rotating compressible convection in low Prandtl number gases, despite the astrophysical relevance of this regime. In this work, we investigate this parameter regime with both the NSE and the AE, and show that the fundamental instability consists of compressional quasi-geostrophic (low frequency) oscillations whose existence intrinsically depends upon the presence of the time derivative of the density perturbation present in the mass conservation equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%