2014
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azu026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Victimization of Andaman Jarawa Tribal Women: An Analysis of the ‘Human Safari’ Youtube Videos (2012) and Its Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of this research, cyber violence is defined as the perpetration of gender-based harms and abuse through digital and technological means by strangers and intimate partners (Backe et al, 2018). Other terms used to describe online harms on digital platforms and through technology are cyber abuse (Altobelli, 2010; David & Schmidt, 2016), online victimisation (Halder & Jaishankar, 2014; Marret & Choo, 2017), cybercrime (Halder, 2015; Halder & Jaishankar, 2011), cyber aggression (Watkins et al, 2018; Wright, 2015) and technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV) (Henry & Powell, 2015). As such, it has a number of manifestations, which will be considered in this study; gender-based hate speech, also referred to as e-bile (sexually abusive discourse online; Jane, 2014a; Jane, 2014b; Vitis & Gilmour, 2017), image-based abuse (non-consensual creation and distribution of images; McGlynn & Rackley, 2017; Powell et al, 2018), non-consensual sexting (Bluett-Boyd et al, 2013; Powell, 2010; Powell & Henry, 2017; Woodlock, 2014) and cyberstalking (to stalk or harass someone online; Barak, 2005; Citron, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this research, cyber violence is defined as the perpetration of gender-based harms and abuse through digital and technological means by strangers and intimate partners (Backe et al, 2018). Other terms used to describe online harms on digital platforms and through technology are cyber abuse (Altobelli, 2010; David & Schmidt, 2016), online victimisation (Halder & Jaishankar, 2014; Marret & Choo, 2017), cybercrime (Halder, 2015; Halder & Jaishankar, 2011), cyber aggression (Watkins et al, 2018; Wright, 2015) and technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV) (Henry & Powell, 2015). As such, it has a number of manifestations, which will be considered in this study; gender-based hate speech, also referred to as e-bile (sexually abusive discourse online; Jane, 2014a; Jane, 2014b; Vitis & Gilmour, 2017), image-based abuse (non-consensual creation and distribution of images; McGlynn & Rackley, 2017; Powell et al, 2018), non-consensual sexting (Bluett-Boyd et al, 2013; Powell, 2010; Powell & Henry, 2017; Woodlock, 2014) and cyberstalking (to stalk or harass someone online; Barak, 2005; Citron, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such fan frenzies may fall directly in the category of cyber crimes against women as has been explained by (Halder, Jaishankar, 2011). It is essentially so because in the course of victimisation, women actors may face infringement of privacy, may have to face criminal intimidation, may be 'consumed' as 'female sex objects' without their wish, and thereby may be subjected to 'visual victimisation' online (Halder, Jaishankar, 2014). This article argues that while effects of fan frenzies on still and audio-visual images of the Hollywood film stars have been researched upon by several researchers including Lipton (2010), Rolph (2010) and Cianfagilone (2011) from the Copy Right laws point of view, rarely any studies have been made on the effects of fan frenzies to Hollywood and Bollywood female cine actors from the perspectives of cyber crimes targeting women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%