2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1364-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online training and support program (iSupport) for informal dementia caregivers: protocol for an intervention study in Portugal

Abstract: Background: Informal caregivers (IC) of people with dementia (PwD) are at greater risk of developing physical and mental health problems when compared to the general population and to IC of people with other chronic diseases. Internet-based interventions have been explored for their potential to minimize the negative effects of caring, accounting for their ubiquitous nature, convenient delivery, potential scalability and presumed (cost) effectiveness. iSupport is a self-help online program developed by the Wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research with iSupport also includes a subsequent intervention study to determine the efficacy of the Portuguese version of iSupport in decreasing caregivers' burden as well as symptoms of depression and anxiety (Teles et al, 2020). In what concerns the effectiveness of culturally adapted vs. non-adapted interventions on clinical outcomes, the evidence from several systematic reviews and meta-analysis is mixed (Benish et al, 2011;Cabral & Smith, 2011;Chowdhary et al, 2014;Cuijpers et al, 2008;Griner & Smith, 2006;Hall et al, 2016;Hodge et al, 2010;Huey & Polo, 2008;van Loon et al, 2013), with effect sizes ranging from almost zero (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research with iSupport also includes a subsequent intervention study to determine the efficacy of the Portuguese version of iSupport in decreasing caregivers' burden as well as symptoms of depression and anxiety (Teles et al, 2020). In what concerns the effectiveness of culturally adapted vs. non-adapted interventions on clinical outcomes, the evidence from several systematic reviews and meta-analysis is mixed (Benish et al, 2011;Cabral & Smith, 2011;Chowdhary et al, 2014;Cuijpers et al, 2008;Griner & Smith, 2006;Hall et al, 2016;Hodge et al, 2010;Huey & Polo, 2008;van Loon et al, 2013), with effect sizes ranging from almost zero (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology of these interventions ranges from programs based on chat groups with videos and teaching material [49] to web-based interventions with information modules, chats, and videoconferences with professionals and other ICs [33,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. One of these programs, developed by the WHO (iSupport), has been translated into several different languages to adapt it to different media and cultures [28,60].…”
Section: • Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, while findings from this study with respect to participants' willingness to use the program and anticipated benefits were encouraging, further research endeavours are needed. Future research includes collecting usage data (e.g., number of visits), and conducting an effectiveness study (see ( Teles et al, 2020d ) for the RCT protocol).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%