2019
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online tool for monitoring adverse events in patients with cancer during treatment (eRAPID): field testing in a clinical setting

Abstract: ObjectivesElectronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice (eRAPID) is an online system developed to support patient care during cancer treatment by improving the detection and management of treatment-related symptoms. Patients can complete symptom reports from home and receive severity-based self-management advice, including notifications to contact the hospital for severe symptoms. Patient data are available in electronic records for staff to review. Prior to the commenceme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Symptom selfreport items originated or were informed by established, validated measures used widely in studies of cancer patients. Participant refusal rates are in keeping with other similar pilot studies [63] and studies of surgical patients [64][65][66] and likely reflect in part how unwell participants were feeling soon after major cancer surgery when they were approached about recruitment to the study. It is possible that patients who declined to participate may have been feeling more unwell than those who took part.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Symptom selfreport items originated or were informed by established, validated measures used widely in studies of cancer patients. Participant refusal rates are in keeping with other similar pilot studies [63] and studies of surgical patients [64][65][66] and likely reflect in part how unwell participants were feeling soon after major cancer surgery when they were approached about recruitment to the study. It is possible that patients who declined to participate may have been feeling more unwell than those who took part.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, by providing relevant and reassuring guidance to participants about when it was appropriate to contact HCPs, or when symptoms could instead be self-managed, the ePRO system enabled participants to make informed decisions. Similar themes of reassurance and increasing confidence in decisionmaking have been reported by participants using the eRA-PID system during chemotherapy treatment [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Table 2 shows that patient data capture technologies included 1 smartphone application available for Android phones 20 and 2 online patient portals tethered to the EHR, 25 , 27 , 30 but the majority of systems used websites that could be accessed from the patient’s home computer or any web-based device. 21–23 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 31 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%