2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4621-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online tool condition monitoring in turning titanium (grade 5) using acoustic emission: modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, when employing these technologies, the cutting tools are extracted from the manufacturing machine and placed on the measuring instruments to inspect the cutting tool conditions directly. Indirect monitoring technologies measure sensing signals corresponding to the insert condition during the machining process, including information, such as cutting force [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ], vibration [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], acoustic emissions [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], temperature [ 16 ], and sound [ 17 ], and subsequently analyze the signals for tool condition classification. Indirect monitoring technologies have lower tool condition classification accuracy than do direct types; however, they are applicable for online tool condition inspection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, when employing these technologies, the cutting tools are extracted from the manufacturing machine and placed on the measuring instruments to inspect the cutting tool conditions directly. Indirect monitoring technologies measure sensing signals corresponding to the insert condition during the machining process, including information, such as cutting force [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ], vibration [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], acoustic emissions [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], temperature [ 16 ], and sound [ 17 ], and subsequently analyze the signals for tool condition classification. Indirect monitoring technologies have lower tool condition classification accuracy than do direct types; however, they are applicable for online tool condition inspection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, a number of research works have been developed with the aim to monitor the tool conditions based on relevant sensor signals acquired during the machining process. Kosaraju et al [ 12 ] presented a procedure based on the acquisition of acoustic emission (AE) signals for tool wear prediction in the turning of titanium alloy. In Reference [ 13 ], Jemielniak discussed the main challenges related to the employment of acoustic emission sensors in tool condition monitoring, which requires an effective pre-processing of the high-frequency signals in order to reduce background noise, e.g., through the use of appropriate filters in the pre-amplifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another work has focused on estimation of tool’s flank wear using AE signals. 10 The authors have used the root mean square value of AE recorded at the chip-tool contact to detect the progression of flank wear in turning of a titanium alloy with coated carbide tool. Similarly, Bhaskaran et al 11 have used the skew and kurtosis parameters of the root mean square values of AE signal to estimate tool wear in a hard turning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%