2014
DOI: 10.5194/amt-7-2645-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online technique for isotope and mixing ratios of CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, Xe and mixing ratios of organic trace gases on a single ice core sample

Abstract: Abstract. Firn and polar ice cores enclosing trace gas species offer a unique archive to study changes in the past atmosphere and in terrestrial/marine source regions. Here we present a new online technique for ice core and air samples to measure a suite of isotope ratios and mixing ratios of trace gas species on a single sample. Isotope ratios are determined on methane, nitrous oxide and xenon with reproducibilities for ice core samples of 0.15 ‰ for δ 13 C-CH 4 , 0.22 ‰ for δ 15 N-N 2 O, 0.34 ‰ for δ 18 O-N … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical requirement for such an observing system is the availability of a suitable high-precision measurement technique. Currently, IRMS is the standard technique to perform high-precision analysis of δ 13 C-and δD-CH 4 in ambient air (Bock et al, 2010Brass and Röckmann, 2010;Fischer et al, 2008;Sapart et al, 2012;Schmitt et al, 2014). Being a laboratory-based technique, it relies on flask sampling, which severely limits its temporal and spatial resolution capability.…”
Section: S Eyer Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A critical requirement for such an observing system is the availability of a suitable high-precision measurement technique. Currently, IRMS is the standard technique to perform high-precision analysis of δ 13 C-and δD-CH 4 in ambient air (Bock et al, 2010Brass and Röckmann, 2010;Fischer et al, 2008;Sapart et al, 2012;Schmitt et al, 2014). Being a laboratory-based technique, it relies on flask sampling, which severely limits its temporal and spatial resolution capability.…”
Section: S Eyer Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before use, the biogenic CH 4 was purified from major contaminants, mainly CO 2 and H 2 O, by flushing it through an Ascarite/Mg(ClO 4 ) 2 trap. The δ 13 C and δD-CH 4 values of the reference gases CG 1 and CG 2, as well as of a cylinder with pressurized air used as the target gas were calibrated against the calibration scales of the Stable Isotope Laboratory of the Max Planck Institute (MPI) for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany (Sperlich et al, , 2013P. Sperlich, personal communication, 2016).…”
Section: Calibration Gases and Target Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UB measurements are referenced to a whole-air working standard with a CH 4 mole fraction of 1508.2 ppb and an assigned δ 13 C-CH 4 value of −47.34 ± 0.02 ‰ (named "Boulder, CA08289" in Schmitt et al, 2014). This value is anchored to the standard scale used at INSTAAR (Sect.…”
Section: Ubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, a method based on a continuous-flow gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) technique combined with combustion and pyrolysis furnaces became available (Merritt et al, 1995;Burgoyne and Hayes, 1998;Hilkert et al, 1999), which dramatically reduced time and effort in the laboratory and likewise the amount of sample air required (now typically 100 mL STP ). Such systems are now used in most laboratories worldwide to acquire δ 13 C-CH 4 and δD-CH 4 data in the current and past atmosphere (Rice et al, 2001;Miller et al, 2002;Sowers et al, 2005;Ferretti et al, 2005;Morimoto et al, 2006;Fisher et al, 2006;Umezawa et al, 2009;Brass and Röckmann, 2010;Sperlich et al, 2013;Schmitt et al, 2014;Bock et al, 2014;Brand et al, 2016;Röckmann et al, 2016). Although these systems use a similar measurement principle, they vary in the use of pre-concentration of CH 4 in sample air, GC separation and combustion/pyrolysis, data corrections and in the specific IRMS instrument among laboratories (see Schmitt et al, 2013, Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are referred to as vacuum-melt data. Schmitt et al (2014) gauged their instrument in an intercalibration exercise with the Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE) in Grenoble on EPICA Dome C (EDC) ice. In short, two time intervals of the EDC ice core, which were previously measured at the LGGE , were remeasured with the vacuum-melt device.…”
Section: Measurement and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%