2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online synchronous generator out‐of‐step prediction by electrical power curve fitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method in [38] is based on centre of inertia (COI) reference, therefore, it is necessary to gather the rotor angles from all of the generator terminals and calculate the COI angle at each time step. In [12–39] the performance of the methods has been evaluated only for the severely disturbed generator. These methods are based on the assumption that the severely disturbed generator has been already identified.…”
Section: Proposed Stability Status Prediction Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method in [38] is based on centre of inertia (COI) reference, therefore, it is necessary to gather the rotor angles from all of the generator terminals and calculate the COI angle at each time step. In [12–39] the performance of the methods has been evaluated only for the severely disturbed generator. These methods are based on the assumption that the severely disturbed generator has been already identified.…”
Section: Proposed Stability Status Prediction Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been proposed in the literature for predicting or detecting transient or STV instability. In [12], first, the trend of generator output power has been predicted using sinusoidal curve fitting and then the transient stability has been evaluated by employing time‐domain equal area criterion. In [13], based on the conversion of the multi‐machine system into an equivalent one‐machine‐infinite‐bus system and predicting the rotor speed trajectory of the simplified system by acquiring online sequential learning machine method, transient instability has been predicted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an AC power system, during normal operation all synchronous generators operate in synchronism, that is, all generators in the grid must have the same frequency and voltage phase sequence. Occurrence of extreme contingencies in a power system can lead to voltage, frequency or angular instabilities, which may result in either under/over-frequency situations or may lead to loss-of-synchronism between zones within the power grid or between interconnected systems [1,2]. If such loss-ofsynchronism occurs, it is imperative that the asynchronous areas be isolated before synchronous generators (SGs) are damaged or before a cascading outage and shutdown of larger areas of the power grid occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges of non-linearity and the rapid development of the electromechanical transient process make it difficult to predict the system transient stability quickly and accurately after the fault has been cleared [6]. In recent years, many large-scale power system blackouts have occurred worldwide, which makes fast-online transient stability assessments and emergency control more urgent [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional transient stability assessment (TSA) methods include a time-domain method based on (1) electromechanical transient simulations [11][12][13], and (2) direct methods based on Lyapunov's stability theory [14,15], transient energy function (TEF) related approaches [2,16], equal area criterion (EAC) related approaches [9,17], and so on. Time-domain simulation with detailed dynamic component models is more accurate and can be used as a standard for testing other TSA methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%