Online Self-Regulated Learning and Cognitive Flexibility through the Eyes of English-Major Students

Abstract

Introduction: Assuming responsibility of learning and showing flexibility in case of changes and problems in learning could make this process more conscious and fruitful. This is significant, particularly at a time when traditional universities are increasingly moving into online education. To address the gaps in previous self-regulated learning and cognitive flexibility research, the current study examined the students’ perceived online self-regulated learning and cognitive flexibility, and looked into the probable relationship between them. Methods: The present study used mixed-research design. The data were gathered from 115 English-major students both quantitatively and qualitatively. The quantitative data were collected through two different scales as Online Self-regulated Learning Questionnaire (OSLQ) and the Cognitive Flexibility Scale. Two open-ended questions probing into both online self-regulation and coping skills of the students constituted the qualitative data. Results: The results revealed that online self-regulated learning and cognitive flexibility correlated positively although the relationship was found to be quite slight, and the students had online self-regulated learning and cognitive flexibility at relatively high level. Students also provided examples of online self-regulated learning strategies they used, and they presented probable solutions to their problems they experienced in improving their level of English. Discussion: Online self-regulated learning and cognitive flexibility, which were positively correlated, are likely to feed the language learning and improving processes since both variables could enable students to take decisions multidimensionally, without confining them to only one type of study skill. Higher level of cognitive flexibility which is associated with adapting to new situations and problem solving could help students to better manage their online learning. However, it should be noted that both self-regulation and flexibility require time and effort, and they are not products, but processes, in the journey of learning; therefore, they could be achieved through raising awareness, providing opportunities for students to self-direct their own learning and to cope with their problems, and undoubtedly instructors’ role-modelling. Higher self-regulation and cognitive flexibility could turn students into autonomous and lifelong learners. Limitations: The study was conducted among undergraduate students in Turkish context. The participants were English majoring students. It could also be carried out among non-English major students because self-regulation and coping skills should be supported in every department at tertiary level. The number of participants could be increased, and students in different departments or in different years of education could be compared. Different variables such as age, gender and language proficiency levels could be included into the study to measure the influences of various elements. Conclusions: Transition into online education at tertiary level brings both advantages and disadvantages; hence, it becomes a must to promote positive aspects and to minimize negative sides. Since online education necessitates more learner autonomy, students should be trained on how to use self-regulatory strategies in language learning. Likewise, such a change in learning setting could require students to be more cognitively flexible to be able to cope with probable difficulties and to expand their thinking skills. Thus, cognitive flexibility should be instilled into the curriculum. The last but not the least, the importance of taking responsibility of learning and seeking for alternatives in the face of problems should be reminded frequently. The study aimed to provide insights and implications for all stakeholders to consider self-regulation and cognitive flexibility in designing online courses.

Assessing Cognitive Flexibility: Quantitative Insights into the Impact of Adaptive Learning Technologies in Special Education

“…The regression analysis indicated that students who used Tech A shown the highest enhancements in cognitive flexibility levels, followed by those who used Tech B and Tech C. It is crucial to take into account the distinct characteristics and design principles of adaptive learning technologies in order to maximize their efficiency in enhancing cognitive flexibility. The results align with the research conducted by Dağgöl (2023), which underlined the importance of adaptable learning environments in enhancing self-regulated learning and cognitive flexibility.…”

Educators as agents of breadth-biased learning: using social reconstructionism as rationale for embracing media multitasking and enhancing teaching practices in higher education

“…Foster reflective practices and self-regulated learning: Encourage students to reflect on their learning experiences and identify instances in their learning journey where mindfulness practices could be beneficial. Teaching self-regulation strategies such as setting intentions and monitoring attentional focus has been found to augment cognitive flexibility and cognitive control among students (Marcovitch et al, 2008 ; Orakçi, 2021 ; Daggöl, 2023 ).…”

Contributions of the 9-Layered Model of Giftedness to the Development of a Conversational Agent for Healthy Ageing and Sustainable Living

“…The 9-Layered Model of Giftedness is a framework that can be used in educational and lifelong training modules implemented in integrated and proactive physical, cognitive and mental health programmes [48,49]. In general, lifelong learning is reciprocally related to higher cognitive skills, such as cognitive flexibility and self-regulation skills; thus, a tailor-made educational and training experience can lead to the synergistic development of individuals' cognitive and emotional components in addition to enhancing employment, social affairs and inclusion [50][51][52].…”