2017 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/mfi.2017.8170400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online reliability assessment and reliability-aware fusion for Ego-Lane detection using influence diagram and Bayes filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, other methods, such as Baysian inference, the Dempster-Shafer theory [35], or neural networks have been used for reliability estimation [24], [23], [8]. These methods come with the drawback that they either cannot explicitly differ between statistical evidence and prior or that unintuitive results occur in case of strongly contradicting information sources [40].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, other methods, such as Baysian inference, the Dempster-Shafer theory [35], or neural networks have been used for reliability estimation [24], [23], [8]. These methods come with the drawback that they either cannot explicitly differ between statistical evidence and prior or that unintuitive results occur in case of strongly contradicting information sources [40].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this example, probabilistic inference can never conclude that the coin is fair as a frequentist probability of 0.5 for each side of the coin can never result. Meth-ods like [23,24] based on the evidence theory [35], in turn, have an explicit representation of statistical uncertainty. However, they suffer from unintuitive or even wrong results when the incoming information is highly contradicting [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, some methods based on LiDAR [27], [28] or fusion of LiDAR and camera [29], [30] have also been used for egolane detection. At the same time, since different sensors have different drawbacks, an online sensor reliability assessment and reliability-aware fusion method was proposed for egolane detection [31]. This paper focuses on solving the feature missing problem by using the road shape prior provided by OSM as the lane model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the automotive domain, integrity monitoring for IVs is used to monitor digital map reliability using a datadriven classifier approach [5] and to estimate and assure lane information quality [6], including probabilistic fusion from multiple sources using the Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory of evidence [7], [8]. While being effective in practice, for their specific use-case, these approaches are tailored towards use of data that is generated from on-board sensors within an IV.…”
Section: Arxiv:190301556v2 [Eesssp] 22 May 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, on the other hand, propose a solution that uses information from the outside and additionally is simple in terms of computational complexity. Lastly, our approach relies on the theory of SL [2], thus does not suffer from the drawback of inconsistent system behavior in some cases due to weaknesses in the underlying DS-based fusion [7], [8]. In comparison to [9], our system takes into account multiple information sources and yields continuous reliabilities as well as their estimation uncertainties rather than a binary classification as part of the fusion process.…”
Section: Arxiv:190301556v2 [Eesssp] 22 May 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%