Online Reactions to the Muhammad Cartoons: YouTube and the Virtual Ummah

Abstract

The publication of 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad by the Danish newspaper Jyllands‐Posten on September 30, 2005, created a great deal of controversy over self‐censorship, freedom of speech, and accusations of religious incitement. Muslim activists organized protests, and later hundreds of people were killed and hundreds of others were injured due to violent reactions to the cartoons. This article focuses on how people used YouTube to react to these cartoons by analyzing 261 video clips and 4,153 comments. Results show that the majority of the video clips and comments were moderate and positive in tone toward Islam and Muhammad; however, a small percentage either called for jihad against the West or made lethal threats against the artist. Other comments carried curses or insults against Denmark, while a few others were anti‐Islamic. The fact that these online reactions were highly varied in tone suggests that the online public sphere is very much divided.

Facebook and virtual nationhood: social media and the Arab Canadians community

“…To build up on Anderson's concept of imagined community, I argue that Facebook itself functions as a virtual nation that only exists online and in the minds of people using the platform. Previous empirical studies reached similar conclusions on the way Facebook, and other online venues can function as virtual platforms for churches and mosques (Radde-Antweiler 2008;Campbell 2010;Al-Rawi 2015a, 2017a.…”

“…This study analyzes the text corpus by identifying the most recurrent words and phrases as well as their associated terms that are used in the Facebook posts and comments (Xenos 2008;Park et al 2011;Al-Rawi 2014, Al-Rawi 2015a, b, 2017b. In some of his studies, Entman used QDA Miner and mentioned that it was useful due to its ''improved efficiency in carrying our more complex content analyses'' (Entman 2010, 334).…”

Mediated Conflict: Shiite Heroes Combating ISIS in Iraq and Syria

“…In the present study, which focuses on Shiite symbols as harnessed by Muslim charismatic leaders, the notion of the “Muslim Ummah” as an imagined community (Anderson, ) is particularly relevant. Here, and in light of the heavy utilization of social media platforms such as YouTube, the concept of the “virtual Ummah” (Al‐Rawi, , ; Lawrence, ; Mandaville, ; Roy, ) or Islamic community, which exists primarily online, is especially useful, since these media not only circulate and inform others in the community but also, in the process, cocreate, reinforce, and spread messages regarding potential and actual leaders and enemies, symbols of identity, and standpoints on the reigning debates. In other words, they define the parameters of the debates as well as the boundaries of the imagined community.…”

Video games, terrorism, and ISIS’s Jihad 3.0

“…42 Indeed, flaming is similar to trolling, but the language is usually harsher, more personal and is far more aggressive since it contains insults, obscenity, swearing, and curses, 43 especially if the topic relates to religion. 44 Whether trolling or flaming, ISIS sympathizers run what is called "'disseminator' accounts" on social media, especially Twitter, which "lend moral and political support to those in the conflict." 45 It is also known as the Swarmcast model in communication studies; "once content is produced and released, it is often the distributing network of media mujahideen, rather than the original producer, that ensures continuing content availability."…”