“…It is evident that the local maximum attained by test 34 does not satisfy all these local constraints, highlighting the need for a second, constraint satisfaction, phase. The algorithm continues with the best solution X 34 = {2, 3,5,4,8,10,11,9,6, 7}, reevaluated after 16000 games in order to ensure a higher precision, attaining f 34 = −3.14496, and then generates the candidates closer to and within the constrained sub-space, as shown in Table 4, for a specified number of tests, e.g., 10 additional tests. The maximum attained at the end of this phase is given by X 44 = {5, 4, 2, 3, 7, 6, 8, 10, 11, 9} with f 44 = −2.95471, reducing the goal deficit by further 0.2.…”