2008
DOI: 10.1080/13562510701794050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Curriculum specialist claimed that using process-based and in-depth perspectives for needs assessment and taking three different instructors' perceptions helped to increase the validity and reliability of program evaluation process (Payne, 1994;Finkelflügel, Cornielje & Velema, 2008;Wen & Tsai, 2008;Karamustafaoğlu, 2009;Teddlie & Tashakkori 2009;Woltering, Herler, Spitzer& Cordon, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Curriculum specialist claimed that using process-based and in-depth perspectives for needs assessment and taking three different instructors' perceptions helped to increase the validity and reliability of program evaluation process (Payne, 1994;Finkelflügel, Cornielje & Velema, 2008;Wen & Tsai, 2008;Karamustafaoğlu, 2009;Teddlie & Tashakkori 2009;Woltering, Herler, Spitzer& Cordon, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They divided them into 12 groups and offered an online peer assessment activity related to their masters and PhD theses and relation to their educational activities. Using comprehensive evaluation models offers creative opportunities to develop and reconstruct the educational programs (Wen & Tsai, 2008). Related to this issue, Finkelflügel, Cornielje and Velema (2008) claimed that use of eclectic and flexible program evaluation models help improve new standards for analyzing and developing social program such as community-based rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of prior studies calculate the correlation between SA and/or PA scores and TA scores to examine the validity of SA and/or PA (e.g. Cho, Schunn and Wilson, 2006;Wen and Tsai, 2008;De Grez, Valcke and Berings, 2010;Liang and Tsai, 2010) but again reach inconsistent conclusions.…”
Section: Self-and Peer-assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the existing SA and PA literature is extensive and covers many disciplines such as medicine, dentistry and foreign languages (e.g., Stefani, 1994;Orsmond, Merry and Reiling, 1996;Longhurst and Norton,1997;Fitzgerald, White and Gruppen, 2003;Cho, Schunn and Wilson, 2006;Lindblom-ylanne, Pihlajamaki and Kotkas, 2006;Evans, Leeson and Petrie, 2007;Papinczak et al, 2007;Wen and Tsai, 2008;Matsuno, 2009;De Grez, Valcke and Berings, 2010;Lew, Alwis and Schmidt, 2010;Liang and Tsai, 2010), it has produced mixed results about the accuracy and construct validity of SA and PA. Therefore, this area of research remains a viable topic of investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, attitudes toward peer assessment may change over time. Studying a group of in-service teachers who were graduate students, Wen and Tsai (2008) used a three-round online peer-assessment procedure and uncovered evidence that the teachers' attitudes toward peer assessment remained positive from start to finish, but that the positiveness declined over time. Therefore, Cheng and Warren (1997) found that, from before to after a peer assessment task, first-year undergraduate students exhibited an increasingly positive shift in their attitudes toward this grading process.…”
Section: Attitude Toward Peer Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%