2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online, offline, or word-of-mouth? Complementary media usage patterns and credibility perceptions of nuclear energy information in Southeast Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Newman et al (2017) found that a growing number of individuals refrained from directly engaging with the news. Rather, individuals turn to online sources as their first and primary source of information (Ho et al, 2019). Another study revealed that individuals increasingly turned to non-news media via online platforms (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Newman et al (2017) found that a growing number of individuals refrained from directly engaging with the news. Rather, individuals turn to online sources as their first and primary source of information (Ho et al, 2019). Another study revealed that individuals increasingly turned to non-news media via online platforms (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to prohibitive overnight construction and waste management costs, the general public often associates nuclear energy with risks that include nuclear accidents, nuclear waste contamination, nuclear weapons proliferation, among others (Yoshida, 2015;Wheatley et al, 2016;Ho et al, 2019). The 1979 three mile Island incident in Pennsylvania, the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine, and the more recent 2011 Fukushima-Daichii nuclear accident ( Van Ness and Gurtov, 2017) have all contributed to the observed public dissent for nuclear energy technology over the past few decades (Fan, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1979 three mile Island incident in Pennsylvania, the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine, and the more recent 2011 Fukushima-Daichii nuclear accident ( Van Ness and Gurtov, 2017) have all contributed to the observed public dissent for nuclear energy technology over the past few decades (Fan, 2018). Overall however, public perception of nuclear energy is shaped by a host of other factors including trust in nuclear governing institutions (Sovacool and Valentine, 2012), knowledge (Ho et al, 2019), political inclinations (Richter, 2017), geographical proximity, and socio-demographic factors (Harris et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, detractors of nuclear energy adoption raise opposition, citing the environmental and security risks that nuclear technology entail (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2014). Multiple studies have been conducted to understand public opinion towards nuclear energy (e.g., Ho, Leong, Looi, & Chuah, 2019;Ho, Looi, Chuah, Leong, Pang, 2018). Despite the multiplicity of debates and studies arguing about the benefits and costs of nuclear energy, the public remains divided in their opinions about it.…”
Section: Spiral Of Silence Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%